StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Mobile Continuous Integration
  5. Buddy vs fastlane

Buddy vs fastlane

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

fastlane
fastlane
Stacks716
Followers437
Votes74
GitHub Stars40.6K
Forks6.0K
Buddy
Buddy
Stacks293
Followers348
Votes606

Buddy vs fastlane: What are the differences?

1. Integration with CI/CD tools: Buddy comes with native integrations for popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and Bitbucket, allowing for seamless automation and deployment processes. In contrast, fastlane primarily focuses on mobile app deployment and does not offer the same level of integration with a wide range of CI/CD platforms.

2. Platform Support: Buddy supports a broader range of platforms including web applications, mobile apps, and server-side projects, while fastlane is specifically tailored for iOS and Android mobile app deployment. This key difference in platform support makes Buddy a more versatile option for teams working on a variety of projects.

3. User Interface: Buddy provides a user-friendly web interface for setting up and managing automation workflows, making it easier for developers and DevOps teams to create and customize pipelines. On the other hand, fastlane relies heavily on command-line interfaces, which may require a steeper learning curve for users who prefer visual tools.

4. Collaboration Features: Buddy offers advanced collaboration features such as code review, feedback loops, and notifications to facilitate teamwork and communication within development teams. In comparison, fastlane lacks robust collaboration tools, focusing more on automation and deployment processes without emphasizing team collaboration.

5. Pricing Model: Buddy offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of pipelines and executions, making it suitable for teams of all sizes. Conversely, fastlane is an open-source tool with no associated costs, which may be appealing for smaller teams or individual developers looking for a cost-effective solution for mobile app deployment.

6. Extensibility: Buddy provides an extensive library of built-in actions and integrations, as well as the ability to create custom actions using scripts or Docker containers. In contrast, fastlane offers a comprehensive set of pre-built actions but may be less flexible in terms of creating custom automation workflows tailored to specific project requirements.

In Summary, Buddy and fastlane differ in their integration with CI/CD tools, platform support, user interface, collaboration features, pricing model, and extensibility, making them suitable for different use cases and preferences in the development and deployment process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

fastlane
fastlane
Buddy
Buddy

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Automatic deployments on push to branch;Docker-based builds and tests;10-minute setup of complete environment;Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket & GitLab;DevOps and website monitoring actions;Clear and telling UI/UX;Supports all popular languages and frameworks, including PHP/Laravel, Node.js, Rails, Python, Java, .NET Core, Elixir and Go
Statistics
GitHub Stars
40.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
716
Stacks
293
Followers
437
Followers
348
Votes
74
Votes
606
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Itunes connect deployment
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 11
    Incredible flexability
  • 9
    Third party integrations
Pros
  • 56
    Easy setup
  • 53
    Docker
  • 50
    Continuous Integration
  • 49
    Integrations
  • 46
    Beautiful dashboard
Cons
  • 1
    Deleted account after 1 month of not pushing code
Integrations
Testmunk
Testmunk
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TestFlight
TestFlight
HockeyApp
HockeyApp
HipChat
HipChat
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
Jekyll
Jekyll
Grunt
Grunt
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Hexo
Hexo
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Meteor
Meteor
Slack
Slack
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to fastlane, Buddy?

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Bitrise

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

AWS CodePipeline

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Codemagic

Codemagic

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

Spinnaker

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Harness.io

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana