Buildkite vs fastlane: What are the differences?
Developers describe Buildkite as "Fast, secure and scalable CI/CD for all your software projects". CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more. On the other hand, fastlane is detailed as "Connect all iOS deployment tools into one streamlined workflow". fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.
Buildkite can be classified as a tool in the "Continuous Integration" category, while fastlane is grouped under "Mobile Continuous Integration".
Some of the features offered by Buildkite are:
- Fast and stable builds
- Open source agent runs on almost any machine and architecture
- Freedom to use your own internal or pre-release tools and services
On the other hand, fastlane provides the following key features:
- Connect all build tools together
- Define multiple lanes for different needs
- Jenkins Integration
"Great customer support" is the primary reason why developers consider Buildkite over the competitors, whereas "Easy to use" was stated as the key factor in picking fastlane.
fastlane is an open source tool with 26K GitHub stars and 3.97K GitHub forks. Here's a link to fastlane's open source repository on GitHub.
Intuit, Zola, and Streamroot are some of the popular companies that use fastlane, whereas Buildkite is used by Shopify, 99designs, and Teleport. fastlane has a broader approval, being mentioned in 93 company stacks & 22 developers stacks; compared to Buildkite, which is listed in 38 company stacks and 8 developer stacks.
What is Buildkite?
What is fastlane?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Buildkite?
What are the cons of using fastlane?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
I use Buildkite because it's the only CI system I've found that strikes a reasonable balance between flexibility and usability. You can accomplish pretty much any standard CI task out of the box with a simple, easy to understand interface and sane defaults, while the hooks and pipeline systems offer enough configurability to rival Jenkins - but without the misery that using Jenkins is certain to entail.
I use Buildkite because it balances enormous flexibility with easy out of the box configuration. We use it for everything from automating builds (which involves running huge test suites where the parallel builds feature is invaluable) to doing nightly batch jobs for our production environment. Super flexible, amazing tool
Buildkite provides testing of the Rails application via a Docker container with Docker Compose. The Buildkite Agent runs on a small Digital Ocean droplet, runs the integration and model tests, and marks the GitHub commit for Heroku to perform their auto-deployments once the build is green.
Fastlane is a perfect tool for the build distributions. Its pretty simple settings allow composing the app builds just with one command. For Flutter it is set up for distributing Crashlytics and Test Flight builds.