StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Buildkite vs Jenkins vs TeamCity

Buildkite vs Jenkins vs TeamCity

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Buildkite
Buildkite
Stacks210
Followers231
Votes115
Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316

Buildkite vs Jenkins vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Buildkite, Jenkins, and TeamCity are popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) in software development. While all three tools serve the same purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Buildkite has been designed to perform well at scale, providing high performance even with large CI/CD pipelines. Jenkins, on the other hand, can experience performance issues with larger deployments, especially when running multiple jobs simultaneously. TeamCity offers good scalability and performance, but it may require additional configuration for optimal performance in larger environments.

  2. Ease of Use: Buildkite focuses on simplicity and ease of use, with an intuitive user interface and minimal setup required. Jenkins, being a more mature tool, offers a greater level of customization and flexibility, but at the cost of a steeper learning curve. TeamCity strikes a balance between the two, offering a user-friendly interface and easy configuration without sacrificing versatility.

  3. Plugin Ecosystem: Jenkins has an extensive plugin ecosystem, with thousands of plugins available to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools and technologies. Buildkite and TeamCity also offer plugins, but their ecosystems are relatively smaller and may not have the same breadth of options as Jenkins.

  4. Community and Support: Jenkins has a large and active community, with a wealth of online resources, forums, and user-contributed plugins and integrations. Buildkite and TeamCity also have supportive communities, but they may not be as extensive as Jenkins. Additionally, Jenkins benefits from being around for a longer time and having a larger user base, resulting in more comprehensive support options.

  5. Pricing and Licensing: Buildkite follows a subscription model and offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options. Jenkins is an open-source tool and is free to use, although additional commercial support is available for purchase. TeamCity, developed by JetBrains, offers a free limited version and commercial licenses for advanced features and larger deployments.

  6. Integration with Other Tools: Buildkite has excellent integration capabilities, with a wide range of options to connect with external services and tools. Jenkins also offers extensive integrations, thanks to its large plugin ecosystem. TeamCity provides good integration options but might have slightly fewer choices compared to Buildkite and Jenkins.

In summary, Buildkite stands out for its scalability and performance, simplicity, and flexible integration options. Jenkins offers a vast array of plugins and a large supportive community. TeamCity strikes a balance between user-friendliness and versatility. The choice between these three CI/CD tools ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Buildkite, Jenkins, TeamCity

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
Pedro Gil
Pedro Gil

Head of Engineering at lengoo GmbH

May 4, 2021

Decided

We replaced Jenkins with Github Actions for all our repositories hosted on Github. GA has two significant benefits for us compared to an external build tool: it's simpler, and it sits at eye level.

Its simplicity and smooth user experience makes it easier for all developers to adopt, giving them more autonomy.

Sitting at eye level means it's completely run and configured right alongside the code, so that it's easier to observe and adjust our builds as we go.

These two benefits have made "the build" less of a system engineer responsibility and more of a developer tool, giving developers more ownership from code to release.

77.7k views77.7k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Buildkite
Buildkite
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Fast and stable builds; Open source agent runs on almost any machine and architecture; Freedom to use your own internal or pre-release tools and services; Powerful distributed build tools; Key/value targeting of agents; Dynamic job allocation allows adding and removing build machines; Shared key/value and binary artifact stores for easily distributing build jobs regardless of machine or network; Integration with pull requests, deployments and releases; GitHub, Github Enterprise, Bitbucket, Gitlab or your own SCM; Slack, Hipchat, Webhooks, and LIFX notifications; Extensible per-project with agent hooks, webhooks and the rest API; GitHub Enterprise is supported standard; SSO
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
210
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
231
Followers
50.4K
Followers
1.1K
Votes
115
Votes
2.2K
Votes
316
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Great customer support
  • 17
    Github integration
  • 16
    Easy to use
  • 16
    Easy setup
  • 12
    Simplicity
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    Github integration
  • 32
    User friendly
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
  • 2
    Proprietary
Integrations
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
GitLab
GitLab
Heroku
Heroku
HipChat
HipChat
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Git
Git
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
TestFlight
TestFlight
No integrations available
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Buildkite, Jenkins, TeamCity?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Semaphore

Semaphore

Semaphore is the fastest continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform on the market, powering the world’s best engineering teams.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana