CapRover vs Heroku

Overview

Heroku

Stacks25.8K

Followers20.5K

Votes3.2K

CapRover

Stacks56

Followers94

Votes54

GitHub Stars14.6K

Forks941

CapRover vs Heroku: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CapRover and Heroku

CapRover and Heroku are both popular platforms used for deploying and managing applications, but they differ in several key aspects.

Pricing Model: CapRover offers a self-hosted solution that allows users to deploy applications on their own servers, providing more control over costs and resources. On the other hand, Heroku is a fully-managed platform with a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which can be more convenient for those looking for a hassle-free deployment experience.
Scalability: Heroku is known for its seamless scalability, allowing users to easily adjust resources and scale their applications up or down based on demand. In contrast, CapRover may require more manual intervention when it comes to scaling applications, as it provides a more hands-on approach to managing resources.
Customizability: CapRover offers greater flexibility in terms of customization, allowing users to configure various aspects of their deployment environment to meet specific requirements. Heroku, on the other hand, provides a more standardized deployment process, which can be both a pro and a con depending on the level of customization needed for the application.
Support and Documentation: Heroku is backed by a strong support team and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for users to get assistance and troubleshoot issues. CapRover, being a more community-driven platform, may have limited official support but benefits from an active user community that can provide help and insights.
Integration Ecosystem: Heroku has a robust ecosystem of add-ons and integrations that make it easy to extend the platform's functionality and integrate with third-party services. CapRover, while still offering some integrations, may not have the same breadth of options as Heroku, which could limit certain use cases or require additional custom development.
Containerization Approach: CapRover leverages Docker containers for application deployment, giving users more control over their environments and allowing for greater portability. Heroku also uses containers but abstracts away much of the complexity, providing a more user-friendly deployment experience at the cost of some flexibility.

In Summary, CapRover and Heroku differ in terms of pricing, scalability, customizability, support, integration ecosystem, and containerization approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku	CapRover
Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.	It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.
Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.	CLI for automation and scripting; Web GUI for ease of access and convenience; No lock-in! Remove CapRover and your apps keep working!; Docker Swarm under the hood for containerization and clustering; Nginx (fully customizable template) under the hood for load-balancing; Let's Encrypt under the hood for free SSL (HTTPS)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 14.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 941
Stacks 25.8K	Stacks 56
Followers 20.5K	Followers 94
Votes 3.2K	Votes 54
Pros & Cons
Pros 703 Easy deployment 459 Free for side projects 374 Huge time-saver 348 Simple scaling 261 Low devops skills required Cons 27 Super expensive 9 Not a whole lot of flexibility 7 Storage 7 No usable MySQL option 5 Low performance on free tier	Pros 12 Mangage complex infrastructure easily 12 Opensource 8 Auto SSL 6 Docker 6 Easy instalation
Integrations
Mailgun Postmark Loggly Papertrail Redis Cloud Red Hat Codeready Workspaces Nitrous.IO Logentries MongoLab Gemfury	MongoDB Docker Node.js PostgreSQL MySQL NGINX Ruby PHP ASP.NET WordPress

What are some alternatives to Heroku, CapRover?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

CapRover vs Heroku: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CapRover and Heroku

CapRover and Heroku are both popular platforms used for deploying and managing applications, but they differ in several key aspects.

Pricing Model: CapRover offers a self-hosted solution that allows users to deploy applications on their own servers, providing more control over costs and resources. On the other hand, Heroku is a fully-managed platform with a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which can be more convenient for those looking for a hassle-free deployment experience.
Scalability: Heroku is known for its seamless scalability, allowing users to easily adjust resources and scale their applications up or down based on demand. In contrast, CapRover may require more manual intervention when it comes to scaling applications, as it provides a more hands-on approach to managing resources.
Customizability: CapRover offers greater flexibility in terms of customization, allowing users to configure various aspects of their deployment environment to meet specific requirements. Heroku, on the other hand, provides a more standardized deployment process, which can be both a pro and a con depending on the level of customization needed for the application.
Support and Documentation: Heroku is backed by a strong support team and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for users to get assistance and troubleshoot issues. CapRover, being a more community-driven platform, may have limited official support but benefits from an active user community that can provide help and insights.
Integration Ecosystem: Heroku has a robust ecosystem of add-ons and integrations that make it easy to extend the platform's functionality and integrate with third-party services. CapRover, while still offering some integrations, may not have the same breadth of options as Heroku, which could limit certain use cases or require additional custom development.
Containerization Approach: CapRover leverages Docker containers for application deployment, giving users more control over their environments and allowing for greater portability. Heroku also uses containers but abstracts away much of the complexity, providing a more user-friendly deployment experience at the cost of some flexibility.

In Summary, CapRover and Heroku differ in terms of pricing, scalability, customizability, support, integration ecosystem, and containerization approach.