Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CloudFlare vs cdnjs: What are the differences?
Introduction
CloudFlare and cdnjs are both essential tools that can enhance website performance by serving content efficiently. However, they differ in various aspects that cater to different needs and preferences of website owners.
Service Offering: CloudFlare is a comprehensive web performance and security company that offers a range of services, including content delivery network (CDN), DDoS protection, DNS services, and more. On the other hand, cdnjs is primarily a free public CDN service that focuses on hosting and serving JavaScript libraries and other web development resources.
Customization Options: CloudFlare provides a wide array of customization options for users to configure settings related to caching, security, performance, and more. In contrast, cdnjs is more limited in terms of customization, as it mainly serves as a straightforward CDN for hosting JavaScript libraries without extensive configuration options.
Security Features: CloudFlare offers advanced security features such as DDoS protection, web application firewall (WAF), SSL/TLS encryption, and more to secure websites from various online threats. While cdnjs also provides a secure environment for serving content, it does not offer the same level of security features as CloudFlare.
Usage Limitations: CloudFlare has different pricing tiers with varying usage limitations based on the selected plan, allowing users to scale their usage according to their requirements. Conversely, cdnjs is a free service with no pricing plans, but it may have limitations in terms of bandwidth, storage, or the number of requests allowed.
Performance Optimization: CloudFlare places a strong emphasis on performance optimization, leveraging its global network of servers to deliver content faster to users worldwide. In comparison, while cdnjs also helps in improving website performance by offloading resources to a CDN, its focus is primarily on serving JavaScript libraries efficiently.
In Summary, CloudFlare offers a comprehensive suite of web performance and security services with advanced customization options and security features, while cdnjs mainly serves as a free public CDN for hosting JavaScript libraries with limited customization and security offerings.
I don't think I have registered a domain in the last 10 years that hasn't been linked to CloudFlare within the first 2 hours from registration.
The benefits you get from even the free version of CloudFlare are amazing. From day 0: - 30/80% of bandwidth savings thanks to their CDN - Origin IP address protection - Managed SSL
Pros of cdnjs
- Fast4
- Free3
- Easy Interface2
- Largest user base1
- Most number of libraries1
Pros of CloudFlare
- Easy setup, great cdn424
- Free ssl277
- Easy setup199
- Security190
- Ssl180
- Great cdn98
- Optimizer77
- Simple71
- Great UI44
- Great js cdn28
- Apps12
- HTTP/2 Support12
- DNS Analytics12
- AutoMinify12
- Rocket Loader9
- Ipv69
- Easy9
- IPv6 "One Click"8
- Fantastic CDN service8
- DNSSEC7
- Nice DNS7
- SSHFP7
- Free GeoIP7
- Amazing performance7
- API7
- Cheapest SSL7
- SPDY6
- Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else6
- Ubuntu5
- Asynchronous resource loading5
- Global Load Balancing4
- Performance4
- Easy Use4
- CDN3
- Registrar2
- Support for SSHFP records2
- Web31
- Прохси1
- HTTPS3/Quic1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of cdnjs
Cons of CloudFlare
- No support for SSHFP records2
- Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits2