StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Centos vs CoreOS

Centos vs CoreOS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CoreOS
CoreOS
Stacks217
Followers297
Votes44
CentOS
CentOS
Stacks13.8K
Followers9.0K
Votes53

Centos vs CoreOS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Centos and CoreOS. Both Centos and CoreOS are Linux-based operating systems but are designed for different purposes. Understanding their differences can help users choose the most suitable operating system for their specific requirements.

  1. Purpose and Design: Centos is a general-purpose operating system derived from the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) codebase. It is designed to be a stable and secure platform suitable for a wide range of applications and use cases. On the other hand, CoreOS is a lightweight Linux distribution that focuses on containerization and is specifically designed for running distributed applications at scale.

  2. Package Management: Centos uses the YUM (Yellowdog Updater, Modified) package manager for managing software packages and updates. It provides a straightforward way to manage software installations, updates, and dependencies. CoreOS, on the other hand, utilizes the Container Linux Update Operator (COSU) for managing system updates and software packages. COSU automatically updates the entire operating system, including the kernel, making it an ideal choice for distributed systems and ensuring the system is always up to date.

  3. Containerization and Orchestration: While both Centos and CoreOS support containerization technologies like Docker and Kubernetes, CoreOS has a native integration with these technologies. CoreOS comes with pre-installed tools such as Container Linux, rkt, and etcd, making it easier to deploy and manage containerized applications. Centos, on the other hand, requires additional configuration and installation of these tools to achieve similar functionality.

  4. Security and Patching: Centos focuses on stability, security, and long-term support with regular security patches and updates released by the CentOS Project. It offers a predictable release cycle and follows strict package signing practices. CoreOS, being a lightweight operating system, adopts an automatic and rolling update model. It regularly updates the entire system, including the kernel, to provide the latest security patches and bug fixes, ensuring a high level of security.

  5. Community and Support: Centos has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, forums, and support channels. It is backed by the CentOS Project and aligns closely with the Red Hat Enterprise Linux community. CoreOS, while also having a supportive community, has a relatively smaller user base due to its specific use case. However, CoreOS is now part of the larger Red Hat ecosystem, which provides additional support and resources.

  6. Lifecycle Management: Centos follows traditional release models, providing long-term support (LTS) versions with updates and patches for years. It offers predictable release cycles and stable environments, suitable for enterprise deployments. In contrast, CoreOS has adopted a rolling release model where updates and patches are regularly released, ensuring that users are always running the latest version of the operating system. This approach is advantageous for distributed systems that require frequent updates and can automatically handle the migration of applications between versions.

In summary, Centos is a general-purpose operating system focused on stability and versatility, ideal for a wide range of uses. CoreOS, on the other hand, is specifically designed for containerized and distributed applications, providing seamless integration with containerization technologies and automatic system updates. The choice between Centos and CoreOS depends on the specific requirements and use case of the user.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CoreOS, CentOS

Jerome/Zen
Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Decided

Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.

CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)

271k views271k
Comments
Jaron
Jaron

CTO at DDVTech B.V.

Aug 27, 2020

Decided

Using Arch Linux for our systems and servers means getting the latest technology and fixes early, as well as early warnings for potential future breakage in other (slower) distributions. It's been easy to maintain, easy to automate, and most importantly: easy to debug.

While our software target is every recent Linux distribution, using Arch internally ensured that everyone understands the full system without any knowledge gaps.

37.1k views37.1k
Comments
Michael
Michael

Sep 25, 2020

Decided

I have used libvirt in every Linux hypervisor deployment I do. I frequently deploy RHEL or CentOS hypervisor servers with libvirt as the VMM of choice. It's installable via the guided setup for EL-based Linux distros, it uses minimal resources and overhead, integrates seamlessly with KVM and Qemu, and provides powerful CLI for advanced users and experts looking for automated deployments, or via VirtManager in your favorite Linux desktop environment. Best used with Linux VMs, it allows KVM and QEMU direct hardware virtualization access.

36.3k views36.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CoreOS
CoreOS
CentOS
CentOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Great to develop; Test; Operate
-
Statistics
Stacks
217
Stacks
13.8K
Followers
297
Followers
9.0K
Votes
44
Votes
53
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Container management
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Systemd
Cons
  • 3
    End-of-lifed
Pros
  • 16
    Stable
  • 9
    Free to use
  • 9
    Reliable
  • 6
    Has epel packages
  • 6
    Good support
Cons
  • 1
    Yum is a horrible package manager

What are some alternatives to CoreOS, CentOS?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

FreeBSD

FreeBSD

An operating system for a variety of platforms which focuses on features, speed, and stability. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large community.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase