CircleCI vs Docker Cloud

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Docker Cloud

Stacks78

Followers127

Votes11

CircleCI vs Docker Cloud: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of DevOps, tools like CircleCI and Docker Cloud have become essential for automating and managing the software development and deployment process. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms is crucial for organizations looking to optimize their workflow.

Operating Level: CircleCI is primarily focused on continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes, providing a platform for automating application builds and tests. On the other hand, Docker Cloud is a container management service that simplifies the deployment and scaling of applications using Docker containers. While CircleCI is more centered around the software development lifecycle, Docker Cloud is more focused on container orchestration and management.
Containerization Support: CircleCI does not have built-in support for containerization, relying on the virtualization of environments for running builds. In contrast, Docker Cloud leverages Docker containers as the core mechanism for packaging and running applications, allowing for a more lightweight and portable deployment process. This fundamental difference in approach impacts how applications are built and deployed on each platform.
Scalability Options: Docker Cloud offers robust scalability options for applications, enabling users to easily scale their containerized services horizontally by adjusting the number of container instances. In comparison, CircleCI's scalability is more limited to the resources allocated for running builds and tests, without the same level of flexibility for scaling application services in production environments.
Integration Capabilities: CircleCI provides seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, enabling developers to trigger builds automatically upon code commits. Docker Cloud, on the other hand, focuses on integrating with Docker Hub for image storage and distribution, along with supporting other third-party services for enhanced functionality.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between CircleCI and Docker Cloud is essential for choosing the right platform that aligns with the specific requirements of a software development and deployment workflow.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Docker Cloud

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Docker Cloud
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Simplify Docker Provisioning;Deploy Apps Anywhere;Automate Your Developer Workflows;Manage Apps Anywhere
Statistics
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 78
Followers 7.1K	Followers 127
Votes 974	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 9 Easy to use 2 Seamless transition from docker compose
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	Docker

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Docker Cloud?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

CircleCI vs Docker Cloud: What are the differences?

Operating Level: CircleCI is primarily focused on continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes, providing a platform for automating application builds and tests. On the other hand, Docker Cloud is a container management service that simplifies the deployment and scaling of applications using Docker containers. While CircleCI is more centered around the software development lifecycle, Docker Cloud is more focused on container orchestration and management.
Containerization Support: CircleCI does not have built-in support for containerization, relying on the virtualization of environments for running builds. In contrast, Docker Cloud leverages Docker containers as the core mechanism for packaging and running applications, allowing for a more lightweight and portable deployment process. This fundamental difference in approach impacts how applications are built and deployed on each platform.
Scalability Options: Docker Cloud offers robust scalability options for applications, enabling users to easily scale their containerized services horizontally by adjusting the number of container instances. In comparison, CircleCI's scalability is more limited to the resources allocated for running builds and tests, without the same level of flexibility for scaling application services in production environments.
Integration Capabilities: CircleCI provides seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, enabling developers to trigger builds automatically upon code commits. Docker Cloud, on the other hand, focuses on integrating with Docker Hub for image storage and distribution, along with supporting other third-party services for enhanced functionality.

CircleCI vs Docker Cloud

Overview