CircleCI vs Puppet Labs

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Puppet Labs

Stacks1.3K

Followers793

Votes227

GitHub Stars7.7K

Forks2.2K

CircleCI vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?

Deployment Automation vs Configuration Management: CircleCI is primarily a continuous integration and deployment tool focusing on automating the process of code deployment, whereas Puppet Labs specializes in configuration management to ensure consistency and adherence to desired system configurations.
Orchestration vs Governance: CircleCI orchestrates the pipeline flow of code changes through various stages, facilitating testing and deployment, while Puppet Labs focuses on governance and enforcing desired state configurations across an organization's infrastructure.
Scope of Automation: CircleCI automates the testing and deployment of code changes within the CI/CD pipeline, while Puppet Labs automates the management and configuration of servers, applications, and infrastructure components.
Target Audience: CircleCI is popular among development teams for automating software delivery processes, while Puppet Labs caters to IT operations teams for managing infrastructure configurations and ensuring compliance with organizational standards.
Flexibility and Customization: CircleCI offers flexibility in integrating with various tools and technologies within the development ecosystem, while Puppet Labs provides extensive customization options for defining and managing complex infrastructure configurations.
Focus on Infrastructure vs Code: Puppet Labs is more focused on managing infrastructure components and maintaining their desired state, while CircleCI concentrates on automating the testing and deployment of code changes.

In Summary, CircleCI and Puppet Labs differ in their primary focus on deployment automation vs. configuration management, orchestration vs. governance, scope of automation, target audience, flexibility, customization, and infrastructure vs. code orientation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Puppet Labs

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Puppet Labs
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Insight- Puppet Enterprise's event inspector gives immediate and actionable insight into your environment, showing you what changed, where and how by classes, nodes and resources.;Discovery- Puppet Enterprise delivers a dynamic and fully-pluggable discovery service that allows you to take advantage of any data source or real-time query results to quickly locate, identify and group cloud nodes.;Provisioning- Automatically provision and configure bare metal, virtual, and private or public cloud capacity, all from a single pane. Save time getting your cloud projects off the ground by reusing the same configuration modules you set up for your physical deployments.;Configuration Management- Puppet Enterprise's declarative, model-based approach automates repetitive tasks and eliminates configuration drift. You define the desired state of your infrastructure, and Puppet Enterprise enforces this state, freeing you to work on tougher projects.;Orchestration- Quickly deploy critical updates, like security patches, across hundreds of servers in seconds, or proactively initiate Puppet runs to update configurations and report changes. Puppet Enterprise allows you to orchestrate controlled, multi-step operations to targeted collections of nodes, giving you complete control over infrastructure changes.;Reporting- Get visibility into your infrastructure, browse resources, and view reports that help you manage your configuration. Puppet Enterprise provides node hardware and software inventory, Puppet run change reports, and node configuration graphs via the product's console or 3rd party APIs.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.2K
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 1.3K
Followers 7.1K	Followers 793
Votes 974	Votes 227
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 52 Devops 44 Automate it 26 Reusable components 21 Dynamic and idempotent server configuration 18 Great community Cons 3 Steep learning curve 1 Customs types idempotence
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Puppet Labs?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Related Comparisons

CircleCI vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?

Deployment Automation vs Configuration Management: CircleCI is primarily a continuous integration and deployment tool focusing on automating the process of code deployment, whereas Puppet Labs specializes in configuration management to ensure consistency and adherence to desired system configurations.
Orchestration vs Governance: CircleCI orchestrates the pipeline flow of code changes through various stages, facilitating testing and deployment, while Puppet Labs focuses on governance and enforcing desired state configurations across an organization's infrastructure.
Scope of Automation: CircleCI automates the testing and deployment of code changes within the CI/CD pipeline, while Puppet Labs automates the management and configuration of servers, applications, and infrastructure components.
Target Audience: CircleCI is popular among development teams for automating software delivery processes, while Puppet Labs caters to IT operations teams for managing infrastructure configurations and ensuring compliance with organizational standards.
Flexibility and Customization: CircleCI offers flexibility in integrating with various tools and technologies within the development ecosystem, while Puppet Labs provides extensive customization options for defining and managing complex infrastructure configurations.
Focus on Infrastructure vs Code: Puppet Labs is more focused on managing infrastructure components and maintaining their desired state, while CircleCI concentrates on automating the testing and deployment of code changes.

CircleCI vs Puppet Labs

Overview