GitHub Pages vs Netlify vs closeheat

Overview

GitHub Pages

Stacks17.7K

Followers13.0K

Votes1.1K

closeheat

Stacks3

Followers18

Votes26

Netlify

Stacks3.6K

Followers2.1K

Votes207

GitHub Pages vs Netlify vs closeheat: What are the differences?

Hosting Platform: GitHub Pages is a static site hosting service that is directly integrated with GitHub repositories, making it easy to deploy websites directly from a GitHub repository. Netlify, on the other hand, is a more comprehensive web hosting and automation platform that offers features like continuous integration, serverless functions, and form handling. Closeheat falls in between, offering a simple way to deploy and host static websites with some customization options.
Custom Domain Support: Netlify allows users to easily configure custom domains for their websites, including setting up SSL certificates. GitHub Pages also supports using custom domains but with some limitations, such as not being able to use SSL certificates for custom domains on GitHub Pages' default subdomain. Closeheat supports custom domains similarly to Netlify, allowing users to personalize their website URLs.
Continuous Deployment: Netlify offers continuous deployment features, allowing users to automatically deploy changes whenever new code is pushed to the repository. GitHub Pages also supports automatic deployments but is more basic compared to Netlify's robust automation capabilities. Closeheat offers a simple deployment process without advanced continuous deployment features.
Deployment Integrations: Netlify integrates with various Git platforms, build tools, and services, making it easy to connect with different workflows and tools. GitHub Pages is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, making it convenient for developers already using GitHub. Closeheat does not offer as many deployment integrations as Netlify but provides a straightforward deployment process.
Serverless Functions Support: Netlify allows users to create and deploy serverless functions along with their static websites, enabling dynamic functionality without managing servers. GitHub Pages does not support serverless functions, focusing solely on static sites. Closeheat also lacks serverless functions support but is suitable for hosting static websites with basic functionality.
Collaboration Tools: Netlify offers collaboration tools and team management features, allowing multiple users to work on and manage websites collaboratively. GitHub Pages, being part of GitHub, also supports collaboration within a team. Closeheat is more geared towards individual developers or small projects and lacks robust collaboration features.

In Summary, the key differences between GitHub Pages, Netlify, and Closeheat lie in the hosting platform scope, custom domain support, automation features, deployment integrations, serverless functions support, and collaboration tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitHub Pages, closeheat, Netlify

Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

Decidedon

Netlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Pages	closeheat	Netlify
Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.	closeheat lets you develop landing pages faster. Use our beautiful landing page templates or import your own HTML/CSS. Do small changes in the browser - publish them instantly.	Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.
Blogging with Jekyll; Custom URLs; Automatic Page Generator	Import your own HTML;High-converting templates;Make changes in your browser;You can use your own setup;A/B testing via simple integrations	Global Network;Global Network;Instant Cache Validation;Atomic Deploys;API proxying;SSL for custom domains;Continuous Deployment;Link to Github or Bitbucket
Statistics
Stacks 17.7K	Stacks 3	Stacks 3.6K
Followers 13.0K	Followers 18	Followers 2.1K
Votes 1.1K	Votes 26	Votes 207
Pros & Cons
Pros 290 Free 217 Right out of github 185 Quick to set up 108 Instant 107 Easy to learn Cons 4 Not possible to perform HTTP redirects 3 Limited Jekyll plugins 3 Supports only Jekyll 1 Jekyll is bloated	Pros 7 2 minute setup websites 6 Great for quick iterations 4 It's fast 3 UI is very intuitive 2 A/B testing	Pros 48 Easy deploy 43 Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments 23 Free SSL support 23 Super simple deploys 16 Easy Setup and Continous deployments Cons 7 It's expensive 1 Bandwidth limitation
Integrations
GitHub	Mailchimp KISSmetrics Optimizely Segment GitHub Mouseflow Google Analytics Qualaroo	GitHub Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to GitHub Pages, closeheat, Netlify?

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

Instapage

The most powerful landing page platform on the planet.

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Firebase Hosting

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

Runkod

It provides decentralized hosting platform and management tools for modern javascript applications and static web publishing.

BitBalloon

BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.

Related Comparisons

GitHub Pages vs Netlify vs closeheat: What are the differences?

Hosting Platform: GitHub Pages is a static site hosting service that is directly integrated with GitHub repositories, making it easy to deploy websites directly from a GitHub repository. Netlify, on the other hand, is a more comprehensive web hosting and automation platform that offers features like continuous integration, serverless functions, and form handling. Closeheat falls in between, offering a simple way to deploy and host static websites with some customization options.
Custom Domain Support: Netlify allows users to easily configure custom domains for their websites, including setting up SSL certificates. GitHub Pages also supports using custom domains but with some limitations, such as not being able to use SSL certificates for custom domains on GitHub Pages' default subdomain. Closeheat supports custom domains similarly to Netlify, allowing users to personalize their website URLs.
Continuous Deployment: Netlify offers continuous deployment features, allowing users to automatically deploy changes whenever new code is pushed to the repository. GitHub Pages also supports automatic deployments but is more basic compared to Netlify's robust automation capabilities. Closeheat offers a simple deployment process without advanced continuous deployment features.
Deployment Integrations: Netlify integrates with various Git platforms, build tools, and services, making it easy to connect with different workflows and tools. GitHub Pages is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, making it convenient for developers already using GitHub. Closeheat does not offer as many deployment integrations as Netlify but provides a straightforward deployment process.
Serverless Functions Support: Netlify allows users to create and deploy serverless functions along with their static websites, enabling dynamic functionality without managing servers. GitHub Pages does not support serverless functions, focusing solely on static sites. Closeheat also lacks serverless functions support but is suitable for hosting static websites with basic functionality.
Collaboration Tools: Netlify offers collaboration tools and team management features, allowing multiple users to work on and manage websites collaboratively. GitHub Pages, being part of GitHub, also supports collaboration within a team. Closeheat is more geared towards individual developers or small projects and lacks robust collaboration features.

GitHub Pages vs Netlify vs closeheat

Overview