StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Cloud Foundry vs PythonAnywhere

Cloud Foundry vs PythonAnywhere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5
PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere
Stacks90
Followers293
Votes64

Cloud Foundry vs PythonAnywhere: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Cloud Foundry and PythonAnywhere, there are several key differences that can impact a developer's choice of platform.

  1. Hosting Environment: Cloud Foundry is a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) that allows users to deploy and run applications in the cloud, while PythonAnywhere is a cloud-based platform tailored specifically for Python web applications. Cloud Foundry supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, providing a more diverse hosting environment compared to PythonAnywhere which is focused solely on Python.

  2. Scalability: Cloud Foundry offers scalability by enabling users to easily scale applications horizontally or vertically based on demand. PythonAnywhere, on the other hand, has limitations in terms of scalability as it is primarily designed for hosting smaller-scale Python applications and may not be as suitable for large-scale deployments requiring significant resource scaling.

  3. Deployment Flexibility: Cloud Foundry provides flexibility in deployment options, supporting deployment from various sources such as Git repositories, containers, and artifact repositories. PythonAnywhere, however, has more limited deployment options as it primarily supports deployment from source control systems like Git, without the same level of integration for containerization or artifact repositories.

  4. Management Tools: Cloud Foundry offers a robust set of management tools and features for monitoring, scaling, and troubleshooting applications. PythonAnywhere, while providing basic management tools, may not offer the same level of advanced monitoring and management capabilities that are available within the Cloud Foundry platform.

  5. Community and Support: Cloud Foundry has a large and active community with extensive documentation, support resources, and a marketplace for add-ons and services. PythonAnywhere also has a supportive community, but it may not offer the same breadth of resources and marketplace options as Cloud Foundry due to its more specialized focus on Python web applications.

In Summary, Cloud Foundry and PythonAnywhere differ significantly in hosting environment, scalability, deployment flexibility, management tools, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
-
Statistics
Stacks
188
Stacks
90
Followers
346
Followers
293
Votes
5
Votes
64
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
  • 1
    Application health management
Pros
  • 15
    Web apps
  • 11
    Easy Setup
  • 8
    Free plan
  • 8
    Great support
  • 8
    Shell access
Cons
  • 1
    No root access
  • 1
    Really small community
Integrations
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Cloud Foundry, PythonAnywhere?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase