Codecov vs Travis CI

Overview

Travis CI

Stacks28.0K

Followers6.7K

Votes1.7K

Codecov

Stacks2.8K

Followers325

Votes102

Codecov vs Travis CI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Here are the key differences between Codecov and Travis CI.

Integration with version control systems: Codecov analyzes code coverage and integrates seamlessly with various version control systems such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. In contrast, Travis CI focuses more on continuous integration and automation of tests in the software development process.
Focus on code coverage metrics: Codecov specifically specializes in providing detailed code coverage metrics, including line coverage, branch coverage, and pull request coverage reports. On the other hand, while Travis CI supports code coverage analysis, it is not as comprehensive as Codecov in this aspect.
Customization and configuration options: Codecov offers a high level of customization and configuration options for generating code coverage reports and setting thresholds for coverage metrics. Travis CI, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in defining the build steps and deployment processes for the software projects.
Support for multiple programming languages: Codecov supports a wide range of programming languages, making it suitable for projects with diverse tech stacks. Conversely, Travis CI is primarily geared towards projects developed in languages such as JavaScript, Ruby, Python, and PHP.
Pricing structure: Codecov offers a free tier for open-source projects and small teams, with additional premium features available for larger organizations. In contrast, Travis CI's pricing is based on the number of concurrent builds and parallel jobs, which may result in higher costs for scaling projects.
Community and documentation: Codecov has an active community and comprehensive documentation resources for users to troubleshoot issues and optimize their code coverage workflow. Travis CI also has a robust community base but may not provide as specialized support for code coverage analysis as Codecov does.

In Summary, the key differences between Codecov and Travis CI lie in their focus on code coverage metrics, integration capabilities, customization options, language support, pricing structures, and community resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Travis CI, Codecov

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Travis CI	Codecov
Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.	Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.
Easy Setup- Getting started with Travis CI is as easy as enabling a project, adding basic build instructions to your project and committing code.;Supports Your Platform- Lots of databases and services are pre-installed and can simply be enabled in your build configuration, we'll launch them for you automatically. MySQL, PostgreSQL, ElasticSearch, Redis, Riak, RabbitMQ, Memcached are available by default.;Deploy With Confidence- Deploying to production after a successful build is as easy as setting up a bit of configuration, and we'll deploy your code to Heroku, Engine Yard Cloud, Nodejitsu, cloudControl, OpenShift, and CloudFoundry.	Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration
Statistics
Stacks 28.0K	Stacks 2.8K
Followers 6.7K	Followers 325
Votes 1.7K	Votes 102
Pros & Cons
Pros 506 Github integration 388 Free for open source 271 Easy to get started 191 Nice interface 162 Automatic deployment Cons 8 Can't be hosted insternally 3 Unstable 3 Feature lacking 2 Incomplete documentation for all platforms	Pros 17 More stable than coveralls 17 Easy setup 14 GitHub integration 11 They reply their users 10 Easy setup,great ui Cons 1 GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight 0 Support does not respond to email 0 Delayed results by hours since recent outage
Integrations
Amazon S3 Heroku AWS CodeDeploy MySQL Red Hat OpenShift Nodejitsu npm GitHub Engine Yard Cloud cloudControl	HipChat Jenkins Bitbucket GitLab GitHub CircleCI Heroku

What are some alternatives to Travis CI, Codecov?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Codecov vs Travis CI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Here are the key differences between Codecov and Travis CI.

Integration with version control systems: Codecov analyzes code coverage and integrates seamlessly with various version control systems such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. In contrast, Travis CI focuses more on continuous integration and automation of tests in the software development process.
Focus on code coverage metrics: Codecov specifically specializes in providing detailed code coverage metrics, including line coverage, branch coverage, and pull request coverage reports. On the other hand, while Travis CI supports code coverage analysis, it is not as comprehensive as Codecov in this aspect.
Customization and configuration options: Codecov offers a high level of customization and configuration options for generating code coverage reports and setting thresholds for coverage metrics. Travis CI, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in defining the build steps and deployment processes for the software projects.
Support for multiple programming languages: Codecov supports a wide range of programming languages, making it suitable for projects with diverse tech stacks. Conversely, Travis CI is primarily geared towards projects developed in languages such as JavaScript, Ruby, Python, and PHP.
Pricing structure: Codecov offers a free tier for open-source projects and small teams, with additional premium features available for larger organizations. In contrast, Travis CI's pricing is based on the number of concurrent builds and parallel jobs, which may result in higher costs for scaling projects.
Community and documentation: Codecov has an active community and comprehensive documentation resources for users to troubleshoot issues and optimize their code coverage workflow. Travis CI also has a robust community base but may not provide as specialized support for code coverage analysis as Codecov does.

Codecov vs Travis CI

Overview