StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Codefresh vs Gatekeeper

Codefresh vs Gatekeeper

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codefresh
Codefresh
Stacks64
Followers111
Votes47
Gatekeeper
Gatekeeper
Stacks16
Followers18
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.0K
Forks824

Codefresh vs Gatekeeper: What are the differences?

Introduction

Codefresh and Gatekeeper are two popular tools used in the DevOps workflow. While they both serve the purpose of automating processes and ensuring efficient development, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore six of these differences.

  1. Infrastructure: Codefresh primarily focuses on code integration and deployment, providing a platform for CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) pipelines. On the other hand, Gatekeeper is a policy enforcement tool that ensures compliance and security in Kubernetes clusters.

  2. Integration: Codefresh integrates well with various cloud providers and version control systems, making it easier to build, test, and deploy applications across different environments. In contrast, Gatekeeper is specifically designed to work with Kubernetes, providing policy enforcement and governance for Kubernetes resources.

  3. Deployment Flexibility: Codefresh offers more flexibility in terms of deployment options, allowing users to deploy their applications not only to Kubernetes but also to virtual machines, serverless environments, and more. Gatekeeper, on the other hand, is tailored specifically for Kubernetes clusters and doesn't provide deployment options beyond that.

  4. Scope: Codefresh covers the entire development lifecycle, from code integration to deployment, and supports various programming languages. In contrast, Gatekeeper has a narrower focus on enforcing policies and access control in Kubernetes clusters, without covering other aspects of the development lifecycle.

  5. Auditing and Reporting: Codefresh offers comprehensive auditing and reporting capabilities, providing insights into CI/CD pipelines, build statuses, and more. Gatekeeper, on the other hand, provides auditing and reporting specifically for Kubernetes resources and policy violations within the cluster.

  6. Ease of Use: Codefresh is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, allowing developers to set up CI/CD pipelines with minimal effort. Gatekeeper, although powerful, has a steeper learning curve as it requires understanding of Kubernetes policies and resource management.

In summary, Codefresh is a versatile CI/CD platform that supports various environments and programming languages, while Gatekeeper specializes in policy enforcement and governance for Kubernetes clusters.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codefresh
Codefresh
Gatekeeper
Gatekeeper

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

It is a simple to use, open-source, web-based tool to see the OPA Gatekeeper's policies deployed in your cluster and their status.

Instant Dev, test and feature preview environments: Enables all team members to run any image as a standalone or composition for feature preview, manual testing, bug reproduction and more. Collaborate on features before pushing them into staging and production.; Testing with every step: Configure your pipeline to run integration and unit tests with every step; Instantly test all code changes in the Codefresh build system before pushing to staging & production. Run integration, unit tests in parallel.; 360° view of Docker images: View commit info, test results and build logs for all images; Manage Docker image labels and status, comment and see new feature branches; search and filter based on any attribute.; Out-of-the-box Docker buildpack for all technologies: Seamlessly package your code in a Docker image. Quickly associate a Dockerfile with your repo by selecting the repository technology stack (Java, Node, PHP, etc.). Codefresh then adds a template for Dockerizing apps.; View and Access Running Container Logs: Access each container log directly from within the Codefresh platform. This lets you easily perform root-cause analysis on failed services and allows you to see logs in high debug model level.; Support for Docker Compose 1 & 2: Manage your Docker Compose file natively in one place, with support for both Docker Compose versions 1 and 2. Use a built-in wizard to write Docker Compose files quickly.; YAML file support: Customize and easily define your pipeline steps using a codefresh.yml file.
An extensible, parameterized policy library; Native Kubernetes CRDs for instantiating the policy library; Native Kubernetes CRDs for extending the policy library; Audit functionality
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
824
Stacks
64
Stacks
16
Followers
111
Followers
18
Votes
47
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Fastest and easiest way to work with Docker
  • 7
    Great support/fast builds/awesome ui
  • 6
    Great onboarding
  • 5
    Freestyle build steps to support custom CI/CD scripting
  • 4
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 1
    Questionable product quality and stability
  • 1
    Expensive compared to alternatives
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Quay.io
Quay.io
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
BinTray
BinTray
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Codefresh, Gatekeeper?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana