Overview

GitHub

Stacks295.5K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.4K

CodeHub

Stacks12

Followers15

Votes0

CodeHub vs GitHub: What are the differences?

GitHub and CodeHub are both code hosting platforms that have gained popularity among developers. While they share similarities in terms of providing version control solutions, there are significant differences between the two platforms. This article highlights the key differences between GitHub and CodeHub.

Repository Management: GitHub offers advanced repository management features compared to CodeHub. It allows users to create, delete, and manage repositories easily through its intuitive user interface. In addition, GitHub provides features like branches, pull requests, and issue tracking, which facilitate collaborative development. On the other hand, CodeHub lacks these advanced repository management features, making it less suitable for large-scale projects.
Collaboration Tools: GitHub provides comprehensive collaboration tools, such as pull requests and code review features, allowing developers to collaborate seamlessly. It enables team members to review and suggest changes to code before it gets merged into the main branch. CodeHub, however, lacks these collaboration features, limiting its capabilities for team-based development and code reviews.
Community and Network: One significant difference is the size and activity level of the user community. GitHub boasts a large and active community of developers, making it easier to find open source projects, seek assistance, or even contribute to existing projects. CodeHub, being a less popular platform, has a smaller community, making it more challenging to find active projects or engage with other developers.
Integration and Ecosystem: GitHub provides seamless integration with a wide array of developer tools and services, making it a preferred choice for integrating various development workflows. It offers integrations with popular deployment services, continuous integration tools, project management software, and more. CodeHub, on the other hand, has limited integrations and lacks the extensive ecosystem offered by GitHub.
Pricing and Plans: GitHub offers both free and paid plans, with different pricing tiers suitable for individuals, small teams, and enterprises. It provides more flexibility in terms of pricing options and features, including private repositories and advanced collaboration tools, depending on the plan. CodeHub, on the contrary, has a single paid plan with limited features, making it less flexible in terms of pricing options.
Mobile Support: GitHub provides a well-developed mobile application that allows users to access repositories, review code, and perform other essential tasks on the go. CodeHub, however, lacks a dedicated mobile application, limiting its accessibility and convenience for mobile users.

In summary, GitHub provides advanced repository management, extensive collaboration tools, a large developer community, integration with various development tools, flexible pricing options, and mobile support. CodeHub, on the other hand, lacks these features and has a smaller user community and limited integrations.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

GitHub

Code Collaboration

Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

137

259k

Advice on GitHub, CodeHub

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	CodeHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	It is the best way to browse and maintain your GitHub repositories on any iOS device.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Issues & Pulls Made Easy; Notifications & Events Be Aware; Repos & Code As GitHub Intended
Statistics
Stacks 295.5K	Stacks 12
Followers 259.0K	Followers 15
Votes 10.4K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	Atom Slack Postman

What are some alternatives to GitHub, CodeHub?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.