Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Codeship vs Testling: What are the differences?

Codeship: A Continuous Integration Platform in the cloud. Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need; Testling: Automatic browser tests on every push. Sign in with your browserling account. free for open source. No sign-up required. Just configure a github webhook.

Codeship and Testling can be categorized as "Continuous Integration" tools.

Some of the features offered by Codeship are:

  • Run you automated tests | Easily set up Codeship with Github or Bitbucket and trigger your automated tests with a simple push to your repository.
  • 100 builds & 5 private projects free per month.
  • Free for OSS.

On the other hand, Testling provides the following key features:

  • Write tests with a minimal test api that works in both node and browsers.
  • Run your tests in node and your local browsers.
  • Run tests in mocha for qunit, tdd, bdd, and exports-style tests.

Testling is an open source tool with 337 GitHub stars and 47 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Testling's open source repository on GitHub.

No Stats
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Codeship?

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

What is Testling?

Sign in with your browserling account. free for open source. No sign-up required. Just configure a github webhook.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Codeship?
Why do developers choose Testling?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    Jobs that mention Codeship and Testling as a desired skillset
    What companies use Codeship?
    What companies use Testling?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Codeship?
    What tools integrate with Testling?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Codeship and Testling?
      Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
      Semaphore is the fastest continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform on the market, powering the world’s best engineering teams.
      In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
      Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.
      Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about Codeship and Testling

      When it comes to continuous Integration services, the choice is hard. There are several solutions available and it looks like the dev scene is very split. We've read and reviewed several solutions and we ended up making the choice between Codeship and Semaphore . Although Semaphore is used by slightly more developers, we've experienced a faster and easy flow using Codeship. Both do integrate Slack and GitHub very well, so this is not a point to set them apart. Both have a complex pricing system that is not that easy to calculate and predict. However, out in the wild, we found Codeship to have a better price point at heavy use.

      See more
      Sebastian Dellwig
      Sebastian Dellwig
      Tech Lead at Porsche Digital GmbH · | 6 upvotes · 53.8K views
      GitLab CI
      GitLab CI

      We are using GitLab CI and were very happy with it. The integration of all tools like CI/CD, tickets, etc makes it very easy to stay on top of things. But be aware, Gitlab currently does not have iOS build support. So if you want to exchange that for CircleCI / Codeship to have to invest some effort. We are using a managed Mac OS device and installed the Gitlab runner there, to have iOS builds.

      See more
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Codeship and Testling
      Review ofCodeshipCodeship

      Working for a web agency, I have access to many premium services for all parts of the development process which leads to two things when it comes to working on my personal projects at home.

      1: I am more fussy about the quality of tools and services that I use than I was before I went from just messing around with programming to having a developer job.

      2: I really don't want to pay a single fee or any kind of subscription to services as after using them all day at work I find it hard to justify personally paying a premium to use them for a bit of time at home after work.

      However with Code ship neither of these things caused any issues as I found it to be very high quality and free.

      On the subject of it being free, I know there are other CI solutions that are free however if you wish to use it with a private repository then unless you already have private Github repos then the fact that Code Ship integrates with Bitbucket can be extremely convenient as it means you can set up your personal projects with free private repository and a free CI / testing solution for absolutely free.

      Overall Codeship has really impressed me in every way from its pricing to its clean and simple UI and its ease of use.

      Avatar of marcqualie
      Marc Qualie
      Review ofCodeshipCodeship

      Setting up continuous integration is complex and time consuming. I've used Codeship for 1 year now and I would never go back to previous systems such as self hosted Jenkins for any kind of web applications. The ability to change developer access on a per repository basis with the click of a button is very helpful and integration with all our services such as Github and Heroku make testing and deployment happen in the background so we can concentrate on our application and not worry about what state the live code is in. We also find the Slack integration (and flowdock before that) to be a great way to share the current code status with the whole team without getting spammed with emails on each commit and build state change while testing prototype branches or working on pull-requests.

      Review ofCodeshipCodeship

      Like most developers I'd love it if my deployment processes were always the same for every project so I never had to think about deployment. However, that's probably never going to happen unless we stop having clients. Codeship allows me to organize all of my deployments into one place and set them up once so that I don't have to remember the process for every nuance of every client.

      Whether it's deploying a Drupal or Wordpress site to a private server, a Meteor.js app to Modulus, or just about anything else Codeship gives me the flexibility of writing my own shell scripts for custom jobs (private server) but also one-click solutions for common problems (deployment to Modulus).

      Highly recommend them!

      Review ofCodeshipCodeship

      It's not easy to differentiate a CI/CD service because integrations matter so much more than the service itself. Didn't even need to read any docs, it just works exactly as you expect it to.


      • Pipelines for running tests in parallel (freemium).
      • Easiest setup of any CI service I've tried.
      • Mandatory build status image service.


      • Test runners are alright, but not that powerful. Py.test can run tests in parallel on its own, but enabling that feature doesn't seem to speed up Codeship runs.
      • Doesn't detect tox environments, so you have to specify one environment per pipeline manually.
      Avatar of gandhiShepard
      Ben Gandhi-Shepard
      Review ofCodeshipCodeship

      I spent half a day grepping CodeShip and now I have a sweet deployment process for WP sites. After a month of wrestling with Bamboo I decided to give CodeShip a try thanks to an article by CodeShip's Roman Kuba about deploying WP sites

      I am now killin' WP development with my CodeShip + WPEngine setup. This is also making WP development/deployment fun for the first time. CodeShip f*cking rocks.

      How developers use Codeship and Testling
      Avatar of Andrew Gatenby
      Andrew Gatenby uses CodeshipCodeship

      We use this as a CI tool when working on our API and related tools. The setup is relatively painless and it hooks directly into our Github repo's to provide reports and feedback.

      Avatar of RentChek
      RentChek uses CodeshipCodeship

      Runs a full test suite whenever we push changes to master and if everything is good, automatically deploys our changes to production.

      Avatar of Kim Do Hyeon
      Kim Do Hyeon uses CodeshipCodeship

      원래 CircleCI 쓰다가 갑자기 슬랙으로 알림오는게 안돼서 Codeship 쓰는 중 Circle CI가 더 편함

      Avatar of azawisza
      azawisza uses CodeshipCodeship

      build center and continous deployment for all services

      Avatar of Grubster
      Grubster uses CodeshipCodeship

      A QA tool that runs the platform's automated tests

      How much does Codeship cost?
      How much does Testling cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      News about Testling
      More news