CodeStream vs Jenkins

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

CodeStream

Stacks26

Followers33

Votes3

CodeStream vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

CodeStream and Jenkins are two popular tools in the software development world. Both serve different purposes and have unique features that cater to specific needs of development teams. Below are some key differences between CodeStream and Jenkins.

Integration with IDE: CodeStream seamlessly integrates with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, Atom, and JetBrains IDEs to provide in-editor comments, discussions, and code reviews. Jenkins, on the other hand, is a standalone continuous integration and continuous delivery tool that integrates with various build tools and version control systems, but does not offer the same level of in-IDE integration for code collaboration.
Code Review Functionality: CodeStream is primarily focused on facilitating code reviews, allowing developers to provide feedback directly in the code editor and have threaded discussions on specific code lines. Jenkins, while it supports automated code quality checks through plugins, does not offer the same level of interactive code review capabilities as CodeStream.
Automation Orchestration: Jenkins excels in automating build, test, and deployment processes through its customizable pipelines and extensive plugin ecosystem. CodeStream, on the other hand, is more focused on enhancing the collaboration and code review experience within the IDE, rather than automating the entire CI/CD pipeline.
Real-time Collaboration: CodeStream enables real-time collaboration among developers by allowing them to discuss and review code changes instantly within their IDE. Jenkins, as a continuous integration tool, focuses on automating the build and deployment process rather than providing real-time collaboration features for code development.
Supported Languages and Frameworks: Jenkins is a versatile tool that supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it suitable for a variety of projects. CodeStream, although compatible with major programming languages, is more tailored towards modern web development technologies and workflows, offering specialized tools for those specific environments.
Ease of Use: CodeStream is designed with a user-friendly interface that promotes seamless code collaboration and review within the IDE, making it easy for developers to provide feedback and discuss code changes. Jenkins, with its powerful automation capabilities, has a steeper learning curve and requires more configuration and setup to leverage its full potential for CI/CD workflows.

In Summary, CodeStream is a specialized tool for in-IDE code collaboration and reviews, while Jenkins is a comprehensive CI/CD tool with powerful automation capabilities for build and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, CodeStream

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	CodeStream
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE. CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Multiple IDE support; Works across branches; Reviews and discussions saved alongside your codebase; Automatic at-mentions; One-click navigation; Streamline code reviews; Merge conflict prediction; Automatic assigning code reviewer; Single Sign On
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 26
Followers 50.4K	Followers 33
Votes 2.2K	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 3 Integrates with everything
Integrations
No integrations available	Slack Asana Bitbucket Jira GitHub Trello Microsoft Teams GitLab Visual Studio Live Share

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, CodeStream?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

CodeStream vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

Integration with IDE: CodeStream seamlessly integrates with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, Atom, and JetBrains IDEs to provide in-editor comments, discussions, and code reviews. Jenkins, on the other hand, is a standalone continuous integration and continuous delivery tool that integrates with various build tools and version control systems, but does not offer the same level of in-IDE integration for code collaboration.
Code Review Functionality: CodeStream is primarily focused on facilitating code reviews, allowing developers to provide feedback directly in the code editor and have threaded discussions on specific code lines. Jenkins, while it supports automated code quality checks through plugins, does not offer the same level of interactive code review capabilities as CodeStream.
Automation Orchestration: Jenkins excels in automating build, test, and deployment processes through its customizable pipelines and extensive plugin ecosystem. CodeStream, on the other hand, is more focused on enhancing the collaboration and code review experience within the IDE, rather than automating the entire CI/CD pipeline.
Real-time Collaboration: CodeStream enables real-time collaboration among developers by allowing them to discuss and review code changes instantly within their IDE. Jenkins, as a continuous integration tool, focuses on automating the build and deployment process rather than providing real-time collaboration features for code development.
Supported Languages and Frameworks: Jenkins is a versatile tool that supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it suitable for a variety of projects. CodeStream, although compatible with major programming languages, is more tailored towards modern web development technologies and workflows, offering specialized tools for those specific environments.
Ease of Use: CodeStream is designed with a user-friendly interface that promotes seamless code collaboration and review within the IDE, making it easy for developers to provide feedback and discuss code changes. Jenkins, with its powerful automation capabilities, has a steeper learning curve and requires more configuration and setup to leverage its full potential for CI/CD workflows.

CodeStream vs Jenkins

Overview

CodeStream vs Jenkins: What are the differences?