Overview

Compose

Stacks258

Followers121

Votes206

MongoDB Atlas

Stacks855

Followers940

Votes34

Compose vs MongoDB Atlas: What are the differences?

Introduction In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Compose and MongoDB Atlas, focusing on specific aspects to help users make an informed decision based on their needs.

Hosted Database Options: Compose primarily offers a variety of database options, including MongoDB, Elasticsearch, Redis, PostgreSQL, and RethinkDB, while MongoDB Atlas focuses solely on MongoDB databases, providing a more specialized and focused service for MongoDB users.
Deployment Flexibility: Compose offers deployment options across multiple cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and IBM Cloud, offering more flexibility in choosing where to host the database, whereas MongoDB Atlas is hosted exclusively on MongoDB's own cloud service, limiting deployment flexibility to MongoDB's platform.
Ease of Management: MongoDB Atlas provides a more streamlined and user-friendly interface for managing databases, scaling clusters, and monitoring performance, making it ideal for users seeking a simpler management experience, while Compose may require more manual configuration and setup.
Scalability: MongoDB Atlas offers more robust scalability options with its sharded clusters, allowing users to easily scale their databases as their needs grow, while Compose may have limitations in scaling options, especially for users requiring complex and large-scale deployments.
Pricing Structure: Compose typically offers a more transparent and predictable pricing structure with the pay-as-you-go model, allowing users to estimate costs more efficiently, while MongoDB Atlas's pricing may vary based on usage and additional features, potentially leading to more fluctuation in costs for users.
Integration Ecosystem: Compose provides a wide range of integrations and add-ons to enhance database functionality, including backups, monitoring tools, and security features, while MongoDB Atlas may have a more limited ecosystem of integrations, which could impact the overall functionality and customization options available to users.

In Summary, the key differences between Compose and MongoDB Atlas lie in their database options, deployment flexibility, ease of management, scalability, pricing structure, and integration ecosystem.

🔥 Trending in Document Databases on StackShare

DigitalOcean Managed MongoDB Document Databases

Hassle-free MongoDB for modern apps

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

Detailed Comparison

Compose	MongoDB Atlas
Compose makes it easy to spin up multiple open source databases with just one click. Deploy MongoDB for production, take Redis out for a performance test drive, or spin up RethinkDB in development before rolling it out to production.	MongoDB Atlas is a global cloud database service built and run by the team behind MongoDB. Enjoy the flexibility and scalability of a document database, with the ease and automation of a fully managed service on your preferred cloud.
One click, production-ready, cloud hosted MongoDB, Redis, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL and RethinkDB, with additional databases in beta. Every deployment features: database autoscaling based on data size usage; private VLAN, IP whitelisting, SSL, full-stack monitoring, custom alerts; HA and fault tolerance with automatic failover; enterprise-grade SSD; easy to add plugins including New Relic; daily, weekly and monthly backups at no additional cost; availability on multiple data centers; a global support team to troubleshoot problems quickly; dedicated servers available.	Global clusters for world-class applications. Support for 60+ cloud regions across AWS, Azure, & GCP.; Secure for sensitive data. Built-in security controls and features to meet your existing protocols and compliance standards.; Designed for developer productivity. Integrated tools to manipulate, visualize, and analyze your data. Execute code in real time in response to data changes.; Reliable for mission-critical workload. Highly available with distributed fault tolerance and backup options to meet your data recovery objectives.; Built for optimal performance. On-demand scaling, resource optimization tools, and real-time visibility into database performance.
Statistics
Stacks 258	Stacks 855
Followers 121	Followers 940
Votes 206	Votes 34
Pros & Cons
Pros 42 Simple to set up 32 One-click mongodb 29 Automated Backups 23 Designed to scale 21 Easy interface	Pros 10 MongoDB SaaS for and by Mongo, makes it so easy 6 Amazon VPC peering 4 MongoDB atlas is GUItool through you can manage all DB 4 Granular role-based access controls 3 Cloud instance to be worked with
Integrations
SoftLayer Heroku Amazon EC2 DigitalOcean	MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Compose, MongoDB Atlas?

MongoLab

mLab is the largest cloud MongoDB service in the world, hosting over a half million deployments on AWS, Azure, and Google.

ObjectRocket

Fast, scalable, and reliably-managed Mongo DB, Redis, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL, CockroachDB and TimescaleDB. An easy to use DBaaS (database as a service) platform on private or public cloud. Complete DB Management & Administration.

ScaleGrid

ScaleGrid is a fully managed Database-as-a-Service (DBaaS) solution for MongoDB, Redis, MySQL, and PostgreSQL on AWS, Azure, DigitalOcean, VMware and OpenStack. Automate your database operations in the cloud so you can get back to product.

DigitalOcean Managed MongoDB

It is a fully managed, database as a service (DBaaS). Build scalable high-performance apps using MongoDB cloud service. It handles the provisioning, scaling, updates, backups, and security of your MongoDB clusters, so you can focus on your apps.