Confluence vs GitLab Pages

Overview

Confluence

Stacks26.6K

Followers19.5K

Votes202

GitLab Pages

Stacks246

Followers295

Votes11

Confluence vs GitLab Pages: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Confluence and GitLab Pages, highlighting their key differences.

Integration with other tools: Confluence offers extensive integration with various applications, such as Jira and Trello, facilitating collaboration and workflow management. On the other hand, GitLab Pages integrates seamlessly with GitLab, simplifying version control and allowing easy deployment of static websites directly from Git repositories.
Hosting options: Confluence is a cloud-based platform, providing ease of use and accessibility from anywhere with an internet connection. GitLab Pages, on the other hand, is self-hosted, offering more control over infrastructure, data security, and customization options.
Content management capabilities: Confluence excels in content management, offering features like hierarchical page structure, advanced search, and content labeling. GitLab Pages serves primarily as a hosting platform for static websites, with minimal content management functionalities.
Version control: GitLab Pages is tightly integrated with Git version control system, allowing easy management of changes, branching, and merging for website development. Confluence, although it offers versioning, is not specifically designed for version control and lacks the advanced capabilities of Git.
Access control and permissions: Confluence provides robust access control mechanisms, allowing fine-grained permissions management for different users and groups. GitLab Pages offers limited access control compared to Confluence and is mainly focused on providing public or private access to the hosted websites.
Collaboration features: Confluence emphasizes collaboration, offering features like inline commenting, task management, and live editing. GitLab Pages, being primarily a hosting platform, lacks these collaboration features and focuses more on enabling streamlined development and deployment workflows.

In summary, Confluence provides a comprehensive content management and collaboration platform with extensive integration options, while GitLab Pages focuses on hosting static websites and tightly integrating with Git version control for efficient website development and deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Confluence	GitLab Pages
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.	Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more
Spaces;Pages;Editor;Macros;Tasks;Attachments;Notifications;Search;Mobile;JIRA Integration;Installation;Customize;Personal;Security	-
Statistics
Stacks 26.6K	Stacks 246
Followers 19.5K	Followers 295
Votes 202	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 94 Wiki search power 62 WYSIWYG editor 43 Full featured, works well with embedded docs 3 Expensive licenses Cons 3 Expensive license	Pros 5 Free 4 Integrated build and release pipeline 2 Allows any custom build scripts and plugins Cons 1 Require Jekyll approach 0 Slow builds
Integrations
GitLab Bitbucket GitHub Google Drive Balsamiq Jira Gliffy	GitLab Jekyll Hugo Middleman Hexo Brunch Octopress Pelican

What are some alternatives to Confluence, GitLab Pages?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Taskulu

Taskulu is a collaborative project planning service. It combines task management, real-time chat and time tracking into a single interface.

Notion

A new tool that blends your everyday work apps into one. It's a unified and collaborative workspace for you and your team

Related Comparisons

Confluence vs GitLab Pages: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Confluence and GitLab Pages, highlighting their key differences.

Integration with other tools: Confluence offers extensive integration with various applications, such as Jira and Trello, facilitating collaboration and workflow management. On the other hand, GitLab Pages integrates seamlessly with GitLab, simplifying version control and allowing easy deployment of static websites directly from Git repositories.
Hosting options: Confluence is a cloud-based platform, providing ease of use and accessibility from anywhere with an internet connection. GitLab Pages, on the other hand, is self-hosted, offering more control over infrastructure, data security, and customization options.
Content management capabilities: Confluence excels in content management, offering features like hierarchical page structure, advanced search, and content labeling. GitLab Pages serves primarily as a hosting platform for static websites, with minimal content management functionalities.
Version control: GitLab Pages is tightly integrated with Git version control system, allowing easy management of changes, branching, and merging for website development. Confluence, although it offers versioning, is not specifically designed for version control and lacks the advanced capabilities of Git.
Access control and permissions: Confluence provides robust access control mechanisms, allowing fine-grained permissions management for different users and groups. GitLab Pages offers limited access control compared to Confluence and is mainly focused on providing public or private access to the hosted websites.
Collaboration features: Confluence emphasizes collaboration, offering features like inline commenting, task management, and live editing. GitLab Pages, being primarily a hosting platform, lacks these collaboration features and focuses more on enabling streamlined development and deployment workflows.

Confluence vs GitLab Pages

Overview

Confluence vs GitLab Pages: What are the differences?