Crucible vs Phabricator

Overview

Phabricator

Stacks221

Followers323

Votes187

Crucible

Stacks55

Followers118

Votes12

Crucible vs Phabricator: What are the differences?

Code Review Process: In Crucible, code reviews are primarily done using a pull request model, where developers submit their code changes for review before merging. On the other hand, Phabricator offers a more integrated code review process by allowing code reviews to happen directly within the tool itself, enabling better collaboration and feedback among team members.
Integration with Other Tools: Crucible seamlessly integrates with JIRA, making it easier to track code changes and associated issues. Phabricator, on the other hand, offers a broader range of integrations with various tools and services, providing more flexibility and customization options for teams.
Collaboration Features: Phabricator offers a more robust set of collaboration features, such as task management, wiki pages, and chat integration, which enhance teamwork and communication among team members. Crucible, on the other hand, has a more focused approach on code reviews and lacks some of these collaborative features.
Scalability and Performance: Phabricator is known for its scalability and performance, being able to handle large codebases and high volumes of code reviews efficiently. Crucible, while suitable for smaller teams and projects, may face challenges with performance and scalability in larger enterprise environments.
Customization and Configuration: Phabricator provides extensive customization and configuration options, allowing teams to adapt the tool to their specific workflows and requirements. Crucible, on the other hand, has more limited customization capabilities, which may not be suitable for teams with unique processes or needs.

In Summary, Crucible and Phabricator differ in their code review processes, integrations, collaboration features, scalability, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phabricator	Crucible
Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.	It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.
reviewing code before it hits master; auditing code after it hits master; hosting Git/Hg/SVN repositories; tracking bugs or "features"; counting down to HL3; expounding liberal tomes of text; nit picking pixels with designers; "project" "manage" "ment"; hiding stuff from coworkers; and also other random things, like memes, badges, and tokens.	Workflow-based reviews;Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets;Create reviews from the command line;One-click reviews from changesets or issues;Threaded comments, inline discussions
Statistics
Stacks 221	Stacks 55
Followers 323	Followers 118
Votes 187	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 33 Open Source 29 Code Review 25 Supports Git/Hg/SVN 18 Bug Tracking 17 Audit Source Code	Pros 5 JIRA Integration 4 Post-commit preview 2 Has a linux version 1 Pre-commit preview
Integrations
Asana Jira CircleCI Jenkins SVN (Subversion) Git Mercurial	Trello Jira Bitbucket Confluence

What are some alternatives to Phabricator, Crucible?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

Crucible vs Phabricator: What are the differences?

Code Review Process: In Crucible, code reviews are primarily done using a pull request model, where developers submit their code changes for review before merging. On the other hand, Phabricator offers a more integrated code review process by allowing code reviews to happen directly within the tool itself, enabling better collaboration and feedback among team members.
Integration with Other Tools: Crucible seamlessly integrates with JIRA, making it easier to track code changes and associated issues. Phabricator, on the other hand, offers a broader range of integrations with various tools and services, providing more flexibility and customization options for teams.
Collaboration Features: Phabricator offers a more robust set of collaboration features, such as task management, wiki pages, and chat integration, which enhance teamwork and communication among team members. Crucible, on the other hand, has a more focused approach on code reviews and lacks some of these collaborative features.
Scalability and Performance: Phabricator is known for its scalability and performance, being able to handle large codebases and high volumes of code reviews efficiently. Crucible, while suitable for smaller teams and projects, may face challenges with performance and scalability in larger enterprise environments.
Customization and Configuration: Phabricator provides extensive customization and configuration options, allowing teams to adapt the tool to their specific workflows and requirements. Crucible, on the other hand, has more limited customization capabilities, which may not be suitable for teams with unique processes or needs.

In Summary, Crucible and Phabricator differ in their code review processes, integrations, collaboration features, scalability, and customization options.

Crucible vs Phabricator

Overview