Crucible vs TeamCity

Overview

TeamCity

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.1K

Votes316

Crucible

Stacks55

Followers118

Votes12

Crucible vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of software development, tools like Crucible and TeamCity assist teams in code review and continuous integration respectively. Understanding the key differences between these tools is crucial for team productivity and efficiency.

Integration Purpose: Crucible is primarily designed for code review, allowing teams to collaborate on code changes, discuss modifications, and ensure code quality. On the other hand, TeamCity focuses on continuous integration, automating the build and test process for projects, providing immediate feedback on code changes to the team.
Supported Languages: Crucible is language-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any programming language, making it versatile for diverse development teams. In contrast, TeamCity supports a wide range of programming languages for building and testing projects, ensuring compatibility with different technology stacks.
User Interface: Crucible is known for its intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers and stakeholders to navigate code reviews and discussions seamlessly. TeamCity also offers a user-friendly interface but is more focused on providing detailed build and test results for projects.
Functional Focus: Crucible prioritizes the code review process, offering features like threaded comments, version control system integration, and custom workflows to streamline code collaboration. TeamCity, on the other hand, emphasizes continuous integration functionalities such as build pipelines, test reporting, and build artifacts management.
Deployment Options: Crucible is typically deployed on-premises, giving teams control over their data and infrastructure, ensuring security and compliance with organizational policies. TeamCity provides both on-premises and cloud-based deployment options, offering flexibility for teams with varying infrastructure requirements.
Pricing Model: Crucible typically follows a licensing model based on the number of users or developers accessing the tool, making it cost-effective for small to medium-sized teams. TeamCity offers a subscription-based pricing model with tiers based on project size and features required, catering to the needs of teams of all sizes.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Crucible and TeamCity is essential for selecting the right tool based on a team's specific requirements and project goals.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity	Crucible
TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.	It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.
Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;	Workflow-based reviews;Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets;Create reviews from the command line;One-click reviews from changesets or issues;Threaded comments, inline discussions
Statistics
Stacks 1.2K	Stacks 55
Followers 1.1K	Followers 118
Votes 316	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 61 Easy to configure 37 Reliable and high-quality 32 Github integration 32 User friendly 32 On premise Cons 3 High costs for more than three build agents 2 Proprietary 2 User friendly 2 User-friendly	Pros 5 JIRA Integration 4 Post-commit preview 2 Has a linux version 1 Pre-commit preview
Integrations
Slack	Trello Jira Bitbucket Confluence

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Crucible?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

Crucible vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Integration Purpose: Crucible is primarily designed for code review, allowing teams to collaborate on code changes, discuss modifications, and ensure code quality. On the other hand, TeamCity focuses on continuous integration, automating the build and test process for projects, providing immediate feedback on code changes to the team.
Supported Languages: Crucible is language-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any programming language, making it versatile for diverse development teams. In contrast, TeamCity supports a wide range of programming languages for building and testing projects, ensuring compatibility with different technology stacks.
User Interface: Crucible is known for its intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers and stakeholders to navigate code reviews and discussions seamlessly. TeamCity also offers a user-friendly interface but is more focused on providing detailed build and test results for projects.
Functional Focus: Crucible prioritizes the code review process, offering features like threaded comments, version control system integration, and custom workflows to streamline code collaboration. TeamCity, on the other hand, emphasizes continuous integration functionalities such as build pipelines, test reporting, and build artifacts management.
Deployment Options: Crucible is typically deployed on-premises, giving teams control over their data and infrastructure, ensuring security and compliance with organizational policies. TeamCity provides both on-premises and cloud-based deployment options, offering flexibility for teams with varying infrastructure requirements.
Pricing Model: Crucible typically follows a licensing model based on the number of users or developers accessing the tool, making it cost-effective for small to medium-sized teams. TeamCity offers a subscription-based pricing model with tiers based on project size and features required, catering to the needs of teams of all sizes.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Crucible and TeamCity is essential for selecting the right tool based on a team's specific requirements and project goals.

Crucible vs TeamCity

Overview

Crucible vs TeamCity: What are the differences?