Overview

Endtest

Stacks10

Followers32

Votes0

Cypress

Stacks2.4K

Followers2.0K

Votes115

GitHub Stars49.4K

Forks3.4K

Cypress vs Endtest: What are the differences?

Test Script Creation: Cypress requires the user to write their test scripts in JavaScript, whereas Endtest offers a no-code/low-code platform where tests can be created through a user-friendly interface without any coding required.
Cross-Browser Testing: Cypress mainly focuses on testing in Chrome browser only, while Endtest supports cross-browser testing, allowing users to execute tests across multiple browsers like Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer.
Integration Support: Cypress is mainly integrated with JavaScript-based frameworks and libraries, limiting its compatibility, whereas Endtest provides integration with a wide range of tools and platforms, including CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Azure DevOps.
User Interface: In terms of user interface, Cypress provides a more developer-centric approach with a command-line interface, whereas Endtest offers a more beginner-friendly visual interface with drag-and-drop functionalities for test creation and management.
Support for Mobile Testing: Cypress is primarily designed for web applications and lacks robust support for testing mobile applications, whereas Endtest offers features specifically tailored for mobile testing, such as device emulation and mobile-responsive testing capabilities.
Community and Documentation: Cypress has a well-established community and extensive documentation, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and find resources, while Endtest, being a newer platform, is still growing its community and documentation resources.

In Summary, Cypress and Endtest differ in test script creation, cross-browser testing, integration support, user interface, mobile testing capabilities, and community/documentation resources.

🔥 Trending in API Tools on StackShare

Teable API Tools

Open-source no-code database fusion of Postgres and Airtable

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0 0

6

Advice on Endtest, Cypress

Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Cypress

Jest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

835k views835k

Comments

Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceon

AngularJS

TypeScript

Cypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Endtest	Cypress
It is a platform that allows you to create, manage and run Automated Tests for Web Applications without writing any code.	Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
Take Screenshots; Unlimited Video Recordings; Generate Random Test Data; Use Variables; Upload Files; Advanced Assertions; Execute JavaScript; Endtest API Geolocation; Screenshot Comparison; Scheduler; Self-Healing Tests; Real Mobile Devices; Test Native Mobile Apps; Notifications; Teams; IF Statements; Live Video; Advanced Settings; Drive Automatic Backups	Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 49.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.4K
Stacks 10	Stacks 2.4K
Followers 32	Followers 2.0K
Votes 0	Votes 115
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 29 Open source 22 Great documentation 20 Simple usage 18 Fast 10 Cross Browser testing Cons 21 Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing 14 Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support 12 No iFrame support 9 No multiple domain support 9 No page object support
Integrations
CircleCI Slack GitHub Heroku Bitbucket GitLab Travis CI AWS CodePipeline Buildkite Codeship	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Endtest, Cypress?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.