StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. DeepSource Analyzer vs SonarQube

DeepSource Analyzer vs SonarQube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
DeepSource
DeepSource
Stacks16
Followers49
Votes8

DeepSource Analyzer vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Key Differences between DeepSource Analyzer and SonarQube

DeepSource Analyzer and SonarQube are both powerful code analyzers that help in identifying and fixing code quality issues. However, they differ in several key aspects.

  1. Ease of Integration: DeepSource Analyzer has a seamless integration process which makes it easy to set up and start using. On the other hand, SonarQube requires more configuration and customization to integrate it into the development workflow.

  2. Language Support: DeepSource Analyzer supports a wide range of programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and Go. SonarQube, on the other hand, has a broader language support and covers a large number of programming languages including Java, C/C++, PHP, and more.

  3. Scope of Analysis: DeepSource Analyzer primarily focuses on identifying code quality issues and security vulnerabilities within the source code. It offers a more targeted analysis by going deep into the codebase. SonarQube, on the other hand, provides a broader scope of analysis by including additional features like code coverage, duplication detection, and architectural analysis.

  4. Real-Time Analysis: DeepSource Analyzer offers real-time analysis that helps in catching and fixing issues as they occur during the development process. It provides instant feedback to developers, enabling them to address issues promptly. SonarQube, on the other hand, performs analysis during the code commit process and provides feedback after a commit is made.

  5. Pricing Model: DeepSource Analyzer offers a more flexible pricing model with free plans available for open-source projects and different subscription tiers for commercial projects. SonarQube, on the other hand, follows a traditional licensing model and requires a paid license for commercial use.

  6. Community Support: DeepSource Analyzer has an active and engaged community that provides continuous support and updates. The community is responsive to user feedback and actively contributes to the development of the analyzer. SonarQube also has a strong community support with a large user base and a wide range of plugins available.

In summary, DeepSource Analyzer offers an easy integration process, supports multiple programming languages, provides targeted code analysis, offers real-time analysis, has a flexible pricing model, and has an active community support. SonarQube, on the other hand, has broader language support, offers additional features like code coverage and duplication detection, performs analysis during code commit process, follows a traditional licensing model, and also has a strong community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
DeepSource
DeepSource

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

DeepSource helps developers ship clean and secure code with powerful static analysis, OWASP Top 10 reporting, and Autofix. Trusted by thousands of startups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
Simple configuration; Continuous analysis; Fewer false-positives; Integration with existing tools; Know each issue in detail; Broad-spectrum of issue coverage.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
16
Followers
2.0K
Followers
49
Votes
53
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Pros
  • 3
    Easy setup and analysis
  • 3
    Free for open source
  • 2
    Autofixes for many lints for free
Cons
  • 1
    Test coverage % differs from actual
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
C#
C#
Terraform
Terraform
Docker
Docker
Scala
Scala
GitHub
GitHub
JavaScript
JavaScript
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, DeepSource?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana