Docker Compose vs Drone.io

Overview

Drone.io

Stacks884

Followers456

Votes258

Docker Compose

Stacks22.3K

Followers16.5K

Votes501

GitHub Stars36.4K

Forks5.5K

Docker Compose vs Drone.io: What are the differences?

Introduction:
In the realm of containerization and continuous integration, Docker Compose and Drone.io are essential tools used in development and deployment workflows. It is important to distinguish between these two technologies to leverage their unique capabilities effectively.

Integration with Docker: Docker Compose is primarily used for defining and running multi-container Docker applications. It allows users to define the structure of the containers and their interconnections in a single YAML file. On the other hand, Drone.io is a continuous integration and delivery tool that automates the build, test, and deployment processes. While Drone.io can utilize Docker containers for running builds, it is not limited to only Docker-based applications.
Workflow Orchestration: Docker Compose focuses on managing the composition of containers within a single application. It provides a way to define and run multiple containers as a single service. In contrast, Drone.io focuses on automating the entire software development workflow. It orchestrates the build pipeline from code commit to deployment, including testing, building, and deployment stages.
Resource Requirements: Docker Compose is resource-efficient for local development scenarios, where developers can easily spin up multiple containers for testing applications. On the other hand, Drone.io requires dedicated infrastructure for hosting the build pipelines and runners, which may lead to higher resource consumption compared to Docker Compose.
Extensibility and Plugins: Drone.io offers a wide range of plugins and integrations with various external services, enabling users to extend its functionality based on their requirements. It allows for easy integration with popular version control systems, cloud providers, and notification services. In contrast, Docker Compose is more focused on container orchestration and does not provide the same level of extensibility through plugins.
Scalability: Docker Compose is suitable for small to medium-sized projects, where the focus is on defining and managing container compositions within a single application. In contrast, Drone.io is designed to handle large-scale build pipelines and automation workflows. It can scale to support complex projects with multiple branches, environments, and deployment strategies.

In Summary, Docker Compose is ideal for managing container compositions within a single application, while Drone.io excels in automating the development workflow with extensive integrations and scalability for complex projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Drone.io, Docker Compose

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Drone.io	Docker Compose
Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.	With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
Free for open-source;GitHub, BitBucket integration;Browser testing;Deplot with Amazon, Heroku, Google AppEngine;Flexible scripting;Team billing;	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 36.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 5.5K
Stacks 884	Stacks 22.3K
Followers 456	Followers 16.5K
Votes 258	Votes 501
Pros & Cons
Pros 51 Open source 50 Built on docker 27 Free for open source 23 GitHub integration 18 Easy Setup Cons 3 Very basic documentation	Pros 123 Multi-container descriptor 110 Fast development environment setup 79 Easy linking of containers 68 Simple yaml configuration 60 Easy setup Cons 9 Tied to single machine 5 Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
Docker Bitbucket Google App Engine Heroku GitHub Amazon S3 dotCloud	Docker

What are some alternatives to Drone.io, Docker Compose?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Related Comparisons

Docker Compose vs Drone.io: What are the differences?

Introduction:
In the realm of containerization and continuous integration, Docker Compose and Drone.io are essential tools used in development and deployment workflows. It is important to distinguish between these two technologies to leverage their unique capabilities effectively.

Integration with Docker: Docker Compose is primarily used for defining and running multi-container Docker applications. It allows users to define the structure of the containers and their interconnections in a single YAML file. On the other hand, Drone.io is a continuous integration and delivery tool that automates the build, test, and deployment processes. While Drone.io can utilize Docker containers for running builds, it is not limited to only Docker-based applications.
Workflow Orchestration: Docker Compose focuses on managing the composition of containers within a single application. It provides a way to define and run multiple containers as a single service. In contrast, Drone.io focuses on automating the entire software development workflow. It orchestrates the build pipeline from code commit to deployment, including testing, building, and deployment stages.
Resource Requirements: Docker Compose is resource-efficient for local development scenarios, where developers can easily spin up multiple containers for testing applications. On the other hand, Drone.io requires dedicated infrastructure for hosting the build pipelines and runners, which may lead to higher resource consumption compared to Docker Compose.
Extensibility and Plugins: Drone.io offers a wide range of plugins and integrations with various external services, enabling users to extend its functionality based on their requirements. It allows for easy integration with popular version control systems, cloud providers, and notification services. In contrast, Docker Compose is more focused on container orchestration and does not provide the same level of extensibility through plugins.
Scalability: Docker Compose is suitable for small to medium-sized projects, where the focus is on defining and managing container compositions within a single application. In contrast, Drone.io is designed to handle large-scale build pipelines and automation workflows. It can scale to support complex projects with multiple branches, environments, and deployment strategies.

Docker Compose vs Drone.io

Overview