Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Composer vs Docker: What are the differences?
Introduction
This article will discuss the key differences between Composer and Docker, two popular tools used in web development and deployment.
Installation and Purpose: Composer is a dependency management tool specifically designed for PHP projects. It allows developers to easily manage and install the required libraries and packages for their PHP applications. On the other hand, Docker is a platform that enables developers to package their applications into containers along with all the required dependencies and configurations. It provides a way to create consistent and reproducible environments for running applications.
Resource Isolation: Docker provides strong resource isolation capabilities by running applications inside containers. Each container has its own allocated resources and does not share them with other containers or the host system. This allows for better scalability and efficiency, as resources can be easily distributed and managed independently. Composer, on the other hand, does not provide resource isolation as it mainly focuses on dependency management within a PHP project.
Portability and Environment Consistency: Docker containers are portable and can be easily moved between different environments. This ensures that the application will run consistently regardless of the underlying infrastructure. Composer, on the other hand, relies on the local environment and the availability of PHP dependencies on the host system. This can sometimes lead to compatibility and dependency issues when moving the application to a different environment.
Development Workflow: Composer is mainly used during the development phase of a PHP project. It allows developers to easily manage dependencies, add new libraries, and update existing ones. Docker, on the other hand, is used throughout the development and deployment process. It provides a way to create isolated development environments, run tests, and deploy the application to different servers or cloud platforms.
Dependency Management: Composer focuses specifically on managing PHP dependencies, including libraries, frameworks, and plugins. It provides a simple way to specify which versions of dependencies are required and handles the installation and autoloading of these dependencies. Docker, on the other hand, can handle dependencies for different languages and technologies, not just PHP. It allows developers to package all the required dependencies, including system libraries, databases, and other services, into a single container.
Scalability and Load Balancing: Docker provides features for scaling applications by running multiple instances (containers) of the same application and load balancing the traffic between them. This allows for better performance and high availability. Composer, on the other hand, does not have built-in features for scaling or load balancing, as it is primarily focused on dependency management within a single PHP project.
In summary, Composer is a tool for managing PHP dependencies within a project, while Docker is a platform for packaging and running applications in isolated containers with all their dependencies. Docker provides resource isolation, portability, and scalability features, making it suitable for both development and deployment workflows.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Composer
- Must have dependency manager for PHP7
- Centralized autoload.php3
- Large number of libraries3
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Composer
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3