Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Maven vs Docker: What are the differences?
Introduction: This article will discuss the key differences between Apache Maven and Docker.
Dependency Management and Build Tool: Apache Maven is primarily used as a build automation tool and dependency management solution for Java projects. It provides a robust way to manage project dependencies, including the ability to automatically download and include the required libraries in the build process. Docker, on the other hand, is a containerization platform that allows developers to package applications and their dependencies into a lightweight and portable container. It focuses on providing a consistent runtime environment for applications across different platforms and infrastructures.
Granularity and Portability: Maven operates at the level of individual Java projects, providing a way to manage dependencies and build the projects independently. It is often used in the context of a single application or module. Docker, on the other hand, operates at a higher level, allowing developers to package entire applications, including the operating system, runtime environment, and dependencies, into a single container. This makes Docker more suitable for deploying and running applications across different environments and platforms.
Virtualization vs. Containerization: Maven relies on virtualization technologies, such as virtual machines, to provide a consistent environment for building and executing Java projects. It creates an isolated virtual environment for each build process, which can be resource-intensive. Docker, on the other hand, uses containerization technologies, such as Linux containers, to provide lightweight and isolated runtime environments. Containers share the same host operating system, which makes them more efficient and lightweight compared to virtual machines.
Reproducibility and Version Control: Maven ensures reproducibility by using a declarative approach, where project dependencies and build configurations are defined in a pom.xml file. This file can be version controlled and shared with other developers, making it easy to reproduce the exact build process. Docker takes a similar approach, allowing developers to define the application's runtime environment and dependencies in a Dockerfile. The Dockerfile can be version controlled and shared, ensuring reproducibility across different environments.
Scalability and Orchestration: Maven does not have built-in support for scaling and orchestrating applications. It primarily focuses on building and packaging individual projects. Docker, on the other hand, provides tools and features for scaling and orchestrating containerized applications. Docker Swarm and Kubernetes are popular container orchestration platforms that can be used to manage and scale applications running in Docker containers.
Tool Ecosystem and Integration: Maven has a mature and extensive ecosystem of plugins and integrations with other Java development tools and frameworks. It integrates well with version control systems, testing frameworks, and IDEs. Docker also has a growing ecosystem of tools and integrations, but it is more focused on containerization-related tasks such as container orchestration, image management, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines.
In Summary, Apache Maven and Docker have key differences in terms of their focus (dependency management vs. containerization), granularity, virtualization vs. containerization, reproducibility, scalability/orchestration, and tool ecosystem/integration.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Apache Maven
- Dependency management138
- Necessary evil70
- I’d rather code my app, not my build60
- Publishing packaged artifacts48
- Convention over configuration43
- Modularisation18
- Consistency across builds11
- Prevents overengineering using scripting6
- Runs Tests4
- Lot of cool plugins4
- Extensible3
- Hard to customize2
- Runs on Linux2
- Runs on OS X1
- Slow incremental build1
- Inconsistent buillds1
- Undeterminisc1
- Good IDE tooling1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3
Cons of Apache Maven
- Complex6
- Inconsistent buillds1
- Not many plugin-alternatives0