StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Virtual Machine Platforms And Containers
  5. Apache Maven vs Docker

Apache Maven vs Docker

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker
Docker
Stacks194.2K
Followers143.8K
Votes3.9K
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes414
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks2.8K

Apache Maven vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction: This article will discuss the key differences between Apache Maven and Docker.

  1. Dependency Management and Build Tool: Apache Maven is primarily used as a build automation tool and dependency management solution for Java projects. It provides a robust way to manage project dependencies, including the ability to automatically download and include the required libraries in the build process. Docker, on the other hand, is a containerization platform that allows developers to package applications and their dependencies into a lightweight and portable container. It focuses on providing a consistent runtime environment for applications across different platforms and infrastructures.

  2. Granularity and Portability: Maven operates at the level of individual Java projects, providing a way to manage dependencies and build the projects independently. It is often used in the context of a single application or module. Docker, on the other hand, operates at a higher level, allowing developers to package entire applications, including the operating system, runtime environment, and dependencies, into a single container. This makes Docker more suitable for deploying and running applications across different environments and platforms.

  3. Virtualization vs. Containerization: Maven relies on virtualization technologies, such as virtual machines, to provide a consistent environment for building and executing Java projects. It creates an isolated virtual environment for each build process, which can be resource-intensive. Docker, on the other hand, uses containerization technologies, such as Linux containers, to provide lightweight and isolated runtime environments. Containers share the same host operating system, which makes them more efficient and lightweight compared to virtual machines.

  4. Reproducibility and Version Control: Maven ensures reproducibility by using a declarative approach, where project dependencies and build configurations are defined in a pom.xml file. This file can be version controlled and shared with other developers, making it easy to reproduce the exact build process. Docker takes a similar approach, allowing developers to define the application's runtime environment and dependencies in a Dockerfile. The Dockerfile can be version controlled and shared, ensuring reproducibility across different environments.

  5. Scalability and Orchestration: Maven does not have built-in support for scaling and orchestrating applications. It primarily focuses on building and packaging individual projects. Docker, on the other hand, provides tools and features for scaling and orchestrating containerized applications. Docker Swarm and Kubernetes are popular container orchestration platforms that can be used to manage and scale applications running in Docker containers.

  6. Tool Ecosystem and Integration: Maven has a mature and extensive ecosystem of plugins and integrations with other Java development tools and frameworks. It integrates well with version control systems, testing frameworks, and IDEs. Docker also has a growing ecosystem of tools and integrations, but it is more focused on containerization-related tasks such as container orchestration, image management, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines.

In Summary, Apache Maven and Docker have key differences in terms of their focus (dependency management vs. containerization), granularity, virtualization vs. containerization, reproducibility, scalability/orchestration, and tool ecosystem/integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Docker, Apache Maven

Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker
Docker
Apache Maven
Apache Maven

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
Stacks
194.2K
Stacks
3.4K
Followers
143.8K
Followers
1.7K
Votes
3.9K
Votes
414
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
Pros
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
Cons
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives
Integrations
Java
Java
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
boot2docker
boot2docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Vagrant
Vagrant
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker, Apache Maven?

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

LXC

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

rkt

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana