Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs ngrok: What are the differences?
Introduction
Docker and ngrok are both tools commonly used in web development and testing. While they serve different purposes, they have some key differences that set them apart.
Deployment and Isolation: Docker is a containerization platform that allows applications to be packaged with all their dependencies, including the operating system. It provides a consistent environment for running applications across different systems. In contrast, ngrok is a tunneling software that creates secure connections to expose local servers to the internet. It does not provide isolation or packaging of applications.
Dynamic IP Address: Docker provides an isolated network environment for containers, which allows them to have their own IP addresses. This means that multiple containers can run on the same host with different IP addresses. Ngrok, on the other hand, generates a temporary, dynamically-assigned public URL for tunneling. This URL is not tied to a specific IP address and can change every time ngrok is started.
Portability: Docker containers can be easily moved between different host machines, making them highly portable. The containerized application will run the same regardless of the underlying infrastructure. Ngrok, on the other hand, is dependent on the host machine and network for tunneling. It requires ngrok to be installed and running on the specific host machine to expose the local server.
Resource Utilization: Docker containers provide efficient resource utilization by sharing the host machine's kernel. They use fewer resources compared to running separate virtual machines for each application. Ngrok, however, requires some resources to create and maintain the tunnel between the local server and the internet. This additional overhead can impact resource utilization, especially on low-powered machines.
Advanced Networking: Docker provides powerful networking capabilities, such as creating networks and defining complex network configurations across containers. It allows for inter-container communication and exposes ports to specific host interfaces. Ngrok, on the other hand, primarily focuses on tunneling and does not offer as many advanced networking features as Docker.
Security: Docker provides an additional layer of security by isolating the application and its dependencies, preventing interference with the host system. It also allows for fine-grained control over network access, environment variables, and resource allocation. Ngrok, while secure in its tunneling, does not provide the same level of isolation or control as Docker.
In summary, Docker is a containerization platform that provides a consistent and portable environment for running applications, with advanced networking capabilities and enhanced security. Ngrok, on the other hand, is a tunneling software that allows secure connections to expose local servers to the internet, but lacks the isolation and portability of Docker.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Pros of ngrok
- Easy to use26
- Super-fast11
- Free7
- Awesome traffic analysis page6
- Reliable custom domains5
- Mobile development1
- Shares service-wide metrics1
- Supports UTP And HTTPS0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3
Cons of ngrok
- Doesn't Support UDP5
- El tunel SSH cambia de dominio constantemente1