Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Nomad: What are the differences?
1. Containerization Technology: Docker is a containerization platform that allows developers to deploy applications in lightweight, portable containers. These containers encapsulate all the dependencies required for an application to run. On the other hand, Nomad is a container orchestrator that can manage the scheduling and deployment of containers across a cluster of machines. It provides a more scalable and flexible solution for running applications in production environments. 2. Supported Platforms: Docker can be used on various operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS. It provides a consistent experience across different platforms, making it popular among developers. On the other hand, Nomad is designed to work primarily with Linux-based operating systems and does not provide the same level of compatibility as Docker. 3. Focus on Orchestration: While Docker provides some basic orchestration capabilities, its main focus is on the containerization of applications. It provides simple tools for managing containers locally or on a single machine. Nomad, on the other hand, is specifically designed for container orchestration and excels at scheduling and managing containers across a cluster of machines. 4. Scalability: Docker is suitable for smaller deployments or running applications on a single machine. It can easily be installed and used on a developer's local machine. Nomad, on the other hand, is built for large-scale deployments and can handle complex distributed systems. It can scale to thousands of containers across multiple machines. 5. Community Ecosystem: Docker has a large and vibrant community with extensive support and resources available. It has a wide range of pre-built images and a rich ecosystem of tools and services built around it. Nomad, although growing in popularity, has a smaller community and a more limited set of tools and integrations available. 6. Architecture: Docker follows a client-server architecture where the Docker daemon runs on the host machine and manages the creation and execution of containers. Nomad follows a server-agent architecture where a cluster of Nomad servers coordinate the scheduling and management of containers distributed across a cluster of Nomad clients.
In summary, Docker is primarily focused on containerization and provides a consistent experience across different platforms, while Nomad is designed for container orchestration and excels at managing large-scale deployments.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Nomad
- Built in Consul integration7
- Easy setup6
- Bult-in Vault integration4
- Built-in federation support3
- Self-healing2
- Autoscaling support2
- Bult-in Vault inegration1
- Stable1
- Simple1
- Nice ACL1
- Managable by terraform1
- Open source1
- Multiple workload support1
- Flexible1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3
Cons of Nomad
- Easy to start with3
- HCL language for configuration, an unpopular DSL1
- Small comunity1