Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Dokku vs Heroku: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown formatted document, we will explore the key differences between Dokku and Heroku. Dokku and Heroku are both popular platform-as-a-service providers that offer easy deployment and management of applications, but they have distinct differences in terms of architecture, flexibility, deployment process, scalability, and cost considerations.
1. Architecture:
Dokku is built on Docker and uses lightweight containers for application deployment. It provides a Heroku-like experience but requires manual server setup and configuration. On the other hand, Heroku abstracts away the infrastructure and uses dynos as isolated lightweight containers to host applications, making it easier to deploy and manage without worrying about the underlying servers.
2. Flexibility:
Dokku provides more flexibility compared to Heroku, as it allows users to customize and modify the platform according to their specific requirements. Since Dokku is an open-source platform, users have access to the source code and can make changes as needed. However, with Heroku, users have limited control and customization options as the platform is managed and controlled by the Heroku team.
3. Deployment Process:
Dokku offers a simpler deployment process compared to Heroku. With Dokku, you can deploy your application by pushing your code to a remote Git repository, and Dokku automatically builds and deploys the application based on the specified configuration. Heroku, on the other hand, uses a Git-based workflow, where you push your code to a remote Heroku repository, and Heroku's build system takes care of building and deploying the application.
4. Scalability:
Dokku supports horizontal scalability by using Docker containers, allowing you to scale your application by adding more containers as needed. However, managing scaling and load balancing is manual and requires additional configuration. In contrast, Heroku provides an automatic horizontal scaling feature that allows your application to handle increased traffic by adjusting the number of dynos dynamically. Heroku takes care of load balancing and scaling without requiring manual intervention.
5. Cost Considerations:
Dokku is a self-hosted platform, which means you need to set up and manage your own server infrastructure to run Dokku. This can reduce the costs compared to Heroku, especially for larger applications with high traffic, as you only need to pay for the server resources. On the other hand, Heroku is a fully managed platform where you pay for the resources and services provided by Heroku, which can be more expensive, especially for applications with high resource requirements.
Summary:
In summary, Dokku and Heroku have key differences in terms of architecture, flexibility, deployment process, scalability, and cost considerations. Dokku offers more flexibility and customization options, requires manual server setup, and provides a simpler deployment process. Heroku, on the other hand, abstracts away the infrastructure, offers automatic scaling, and is a fully managed platform. Consider your specific requirements and preferences when choosing between between Dokku and Heroku.
The Friendliest.app started on Heroku (both app and db) like most of my projects. The db on Heroku was on the cusp of becoming prohibitively expensive for this project.
After looking at options and reading recommendations we settled on Render to host both the application and db. Render's pricing model seems to scale more linearly with the application instead of the large pricing/performance jumps experienced with Heroku.
Migration to Render was extremely easy and we were able to complete both the db and application moves within 24 hours.
The only thing we're really missing on Render is a CLI. With Heroku, we could manage everything from the command line in VSCode. With Render, you need to use the web shell they provide.
I'm transitioning to Render from heroku. The pricing scale matches my usage scale, yet it's just as easy to deploy. It's removed a lot of the devops that I don't like to deal with on setting up my own raw *nix box and makes deployment simple and easy!
Clustering I don't use clustering features at the moment but when i need to set up clustering of nodes and discoverability, render will enable that where Heroku would require that I use an external service like redis.
Restarts The restarts are annoying. I understand the reasoning, but I'd rather watch my service if its got a memory leak and work to fix it than to just assume that it has memory leaks and needs to restart.
Pros of Dokku
- Simple23
- Open Source12
- Built on Docker11
- Free11
- Yay, it works like a charm4
- Git deploy4
- HTTP proxy from public hostname to container IP address2
- Zero downtime deploys2
Pros of Heroku
- Easy deployment703
- Free for side projects459
- Huge time-saver374
- Simple scaling348
- Low devops skills required261
- Easy setup190
- Add-ons for almost everything174
- Beginner friendly153
- Better for startups150
- Low learning curve133
- Postgres hosting48
- Easy to add collaborators41
- Faster development30
- Awesome documentation24
- Simple rollback19
- Focus on product, not deployment19
- Natural companion for rails development15
- Easy integration15
- Great customer support12
- GitHub integration8
- Painless & well documented6
- No-ops6
- I love that they make it free to launch a side project4
- Free4
- Great UI3
- Just works3
- PostgreSQL forking and following2
- MySQL extension2
- Security1
- Able to host stuff good like Discord Bot1
- Sec0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Dokku
Cons of Heroku
- Super expensive27
- Not a whole lot of flexibility9
- No usable MySQL option7
- Storage7
- Low performance on free tier5
- 24/7 support is $1,000 per month2