Drone.io vs Zuul CI

Overview

Drone.io

Stacks884

Followers456

Votes258

Zuul CI

Stacks5

Followers21

Votes3

Drone.io vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Drone.io and Zuul CI are both popular tools used for Continuous Integration (CI) in software development. However, there are key differences between the two that need to be considered when choosing the right tool for a project.

Architecture: Drone.io follows a more straightforward architecture with a centralized approach, where each build is executed on a separate virtual machine. On the other hand, Zuul CI is designed with a distributed and scalable architecture, allowing multiple pipelines to run concurrently across a shared pool of resources.
Scalability: Zuul CI offers better scalability compared to Drone.io, as it can efficiently handle a larger number of build and test jobs running simultaneously. This is particularly beneficial for organizations with complex and extensive CI/CD pipelines.
Integration with OpenStack: Zuul CI has seamless integration with OpenStack, making it an ideal choice for projects heavily reliant on OpenStack infrastructure. In contrast, Drone.io may require additional integration efforts when working with OpenStack environments.
Support for Multibranch Pipelines: Drone.io provides out-of-the-box support for multibranch pipelines, making it easier to manage and organize builds for projects with multiple branches. While Zuul CI can also handle multibranch pipelines, it may require more configuration and setup.
Community and Ecosystem: Drone.io boasts a large and active community, with a variety of plugins and integrations available for users to extend its functionality. On the other hand, Zuul CI, developed by the OpenStack community, offers strong support for projects within the OpenStack ecosystem.
Ease of Use and Configuration: Drone.io is known for its user-friendly interface and simple configuration setup, making it suitable for smaller teams or projects with limited CI/CD requirements. In comparison, Zuul CI may have a steeper learning curve due to its sophisticated features and extensive configuration options.

In Summary, Drone.io and Zuul CI differ in architecture, scalability, integration with OpenStack, support for multibranch pipelines, community, and ease of use, providing users with a range of options based on their specific project needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Drone.io, Zuul CI

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Drone.io	Zuul CI
Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.	It is an open source CI/CD platform specializing in gating changes across multiple systems and applications before landing a single patch.
Free for open-source;GitHub, BitBucket integration;Browser testing;Deplot with Amazon, Heroku, Google AppEngine;Flexible scripting;Team billing;	Project Gating;CI/CD with Ansible;Cross-Project Dependencies
Statistics
Stacks 884	Stacks 5
Followers 456	Followers 21
Votes 258	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 51 Open source 50 Built on docker 27 Free for open source 23 GitHub integration 18 Easy Setup Cons 3 Very basic documentation	Pros 1 Open-source Mostly used with Openstack 1 No vendor-lock In. Zero Cost 1 Hard to configure
Integrations
Docker Bitbucket Google App Engine Heroku GitHub Amazon S3 dotCloud	Zookeeper

What are some alternatives to Drone.io, Zuul CI?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Drone.io vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Architecture: Drone.io follows a more straightforward architecture with a centralized approach, where each build is executed on a separate virtual machine. On the other hand, Zuul CI is designed with a distributed and scalable architecture, allowing multiple pipelines to run concurrently across a shared pool of resources.
Scalability: Zuul CI offers better scalability compared to Drone.io, as it can efficiently handle a larger number of build and test jobs running simultaneously. This is particularly beneficial for organizations with complex and extensive CI/CD pipelines.
Integration with OpenStack: Zuul CI has seamless integration with OpenStack, making it an ideal choice for projects heavily reliant on OpenStack infrastructure. In contrast, Drone.io may require additional integration efforts when working with OpenStack environments.
Support for Multibranch Pipelines: Drone.io provides out-of-the-box support for multibranch pipelines, making it easier to manage and organize builds for projects with multiple branches. While Zuul CI can also handle multibranch pipelines, it may require more configuration and setup.
Community and Ecosystem: Drone.io boasts a large and active community, with a variety of plugins and integrations available for users to extend its functionality. On the other hand, Zuul CI, developed by the OpenStack community, offers strong support for projects within the OpenStack ecosystem.
Ease of Use and Configuration: Drone.io is known for its user-friendly interface and simple configuration setup, making it suitable for smaller teams or projects with limited CI/CD requirements. In comparison, Zuul CI may have a steeper learning curve due to its sophisticated features and extensive configuration options.

Drone.io vs Zuul CI

Overview

Drone.io vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?