Eclipse Che vs Portainer

Overview

Eclipse Che

Stacks58

Followers148

Votes28

Portainer

Stacks507

Followers842

Votes146

Eclipse Che vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the realm of container orchestration tools, Eclipse Che and Portainer are two prominent platforms each offering unique features and functionalities. Below are key differences between Eclipse Che and Portainer:

Architecture: Eclipse Che is a cloud-based integrated development environment (IDE) that runs in containers, enabling users to develop, build, run, and debug applications from anywhere. On the other hand, Portainer is a lightweight management tool that provides a graphical user interface for managing Docker containers, images, volumes, networks, and more on any Docker environment.
Use Case: Eclipse Che is designed more for developers and development teams looking for a collaborative and cloud-based development environment, with features such as workspaces, stack integration, and in-built tools. Portainer, on the other hand, is ideal for system administrators and DevOps teams needing a simple, yet powerful tool for managing Docker environments efficiently.
Scalability: Eclipse Che offers scalability through its cloud-native architecture that supports scaling workspaces dynamically based on demand, allowing teams to increase or decrease resources as required. Portainer, while efficient at managing smaller to medium-sized Docker environments, may face limitations in scalability for larger and more complex container setups.
Extensibility: Eclipse Che provides an extensible platform with a wide range of plugins and extensions to enhance functionality and customize the development environment based on specific requirements. Portainer, while versatile in managing Docker resources, may have limited extensibility options compared to Eclipse Che.
Community Support: Eclipse Che has a robust and active open-source community that contributes to its development, updates, and support, offering users a wealth of resources and community-driven solutions. Portainer also has a supportive community, but the level of community engagement and contribution may vary compared to Eclipse Che.
Learning Curve: Eclipse Che, with its feature-rich IDE and collaborative environment, may have a steeper learning curve for new users, especially those unfamiliar with cloud-based development tools. Portainer, with its intuitive user interface and simplified Docker management, generally has a lower learning curve, making it more accessible to a wider range of users.

In Summary, Eclipse Che and Portainer differ in their architecture, use cases, scalability, extensibility, community support, and learning curve, catering to distinct user preferences and requirements in the container orchestration landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Eclipse Che, Portainer

Tan

Apr 24, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Anaconda

Java

I am going to learn machine learning and self host an online IDE, the tool that i may use is Python, Anaconda, various python library and etc. which tools should i go for? this may include Java development, web development. Now i have 1 more candidate which are visual studio code online (code server). i will host on google cloud

297k views297k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Eclipse Che	Portainer
Eclipse Che makes Kubernetes development accessible for developer teams, providing one-click developer workspaces and eliminating local environment configuration for your entire team.	It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.
Universal Workspace; Docker Machines; Workspace Agents; Workspace Snapshots; Collaborative Workspaces; RESTful Workspaces; SSH / Terminal; Cloud IDE; Integrated Ops Environment; Multi-Machine; Multi-Project; Commands; Previews; Java Intellisense; JavaScript Intellisense; Light Theme; Plug-Ins; Open Source;	Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks 58	Stacks 507
Followers 148	Followers 842
Votes 28	Votes 146
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 Cloud IDE 7 Open Source 5 Powerful 2 Can be locally hosted 1 All features free by default Cons 2 LAck of support for golang	Pros 36 Simple 27 Great UI 19 Friendly 12 Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker 11 Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
Azure DevOps Google Compute Engine GitHub Enterprise GitLab Bitbucket GitHub Amazon EC2 Docker Jira SVN (Subversion)	Docker Swarm Docker Secrets Auth0 Kubernetes Docker

What are some alternatives to Eclipse Che, Portainer?

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Built on the open Eclipse Che project, Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces provides developer workspaces, which include all the tools and the dependencies that are needed to code, build, test, run, and debug applications.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

AWS Cloud9

Cloud9 provides a development environment in the cloud. Cloud9 enables developers to get started with coding immediately with pre-setup environments called workspaces, collaborate with their peers with collaborative coding features, and build web apps with features like live preview and browser compatibility testing. It supports more than 40 languages, with class A support for PHP, Ruby, Python, JavaScript/Node.js, and Go.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Koding

Koding is a feature rich cloud-based development environment complete with free VMs, an attractive IDE & sudo level terminal access!

Nitrous.IO

Get setup lightning fast in the cloud & code from anywhere, on any machine.

Codeanywhere

A development platform that enables you to not only edit your files from underlying services like FTP, GitHub, Dropbox and the like, but on top of that gives you the ability to collaborate, embed and share through Codeanywhere on any device.

Related Comparisons

Eclipse Che vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Architecture: Eclipse Che is a cloud-based integrated development environment (IDE) that runs in containers, enabling users to develop, build, run, and debug applications from anywhere. On the other hand, Portainer is a lightweight management tool that provides a graphical user interface for managing Docker containers, images, volumes, networks, and more on any Docker environment.
Use Case: Eclipse Che is designed more for developers and development teams looking for a collaborative and cloud-based development environment, with features such as workspaces, stack integration, and in-built tools. Portainer, on the other hand, is ideal for system administrators and DevOps teams needing a simple, yet powerful tool for managing Docker environments efficiently.
Scalability: Eclipse Che offers scalability through its cloud-native architecture that supports scaling workspaces dynamically based on demand, allowing teams to increase or decrease resources as required. Portainer, while efficient at managing smaller to medium-sized Docker environments, may face limitations in scalability for larger and more complex container setups.
Extensibility: Eclipse Che provides an extensible platform with a wide range of plugins and extensions to enhance functionality and customize the development environment based on specific requirements. Portainer, while versatile in managing Docker resources, may have limited extensibility options compared to Eclipse Che.
Community Support: Eclipse Che has a robust and active open-source community that contributes to its development, updates, and support, offering users a wealth of resources and community-driven solutions. Portainer also has a supportive community, but the level of community engagement and contribution may vary compared to Eclipse Che.
Learning Curve: Eclipse Che, with its feature-rich IDE and collaborative environment, may have a steeper learning curve for new users, especially those unfamiliar with cloud-based development tools. Portainer, with its intuitive user interface and simplified Docker management, generally has a lower learning curve, making it more accessible to a wider range of users.

Eclipse Che vs Portainer

Overview