Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elasticsearch vs InfluxDB: What are the differences?
Introduction: Elasticsearch and InfluxDB are both popular open-source databases used in different scenarios. However, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.
Data Model: Elasticsearch uses a document-based data model, where data is stored in structured JSON documents. It provides flexible and schema-less indexing, allowing for dynamic addition of new fields. In contrast, InfluxDB is a time-series database designed specifically for handling time-stamped data. It organizes data into measurements, tags, and fields, optimizing for efficient storage and retrieval of time-based data.
Querying: Elasticsearch is known for its powerful and extensive search capabilities, offering full-text search, filtering, and aggregations across large datasets. It supports complex querying using a query DSL (Domain-specific Language) and offers relevance scoring for search results. On the other hand, InfluxDB focuses more on time-series data querying, providing functions and operators tailored for time-based analysis, such as windowing, downsampling, and continuous queries.
Scalability: Elasticsearch is designed to scale horizontally, allowing for clustering and distributing data across multiple nodes for increased storage and processing capacity. It leverages sharding and replication to ensure high availability and fault tolerance. InfluxDB also supports horizontal scaling, but it is more limited compared to Elasticsearch, often requiring manual sharding and replication configuration.
Data Ingestion: Elasticsearch provides various methods for data ingestion, including bulk indexing, data streaming, and connectors to integrate with other systems like Logstash and Beats. It offers near real-time indexing, where data is indexed and available for search within a short timeframe. InfluxDB, being a time-series database, excels at ingesting and storing high volumes of time-stamped data, often through time-series-specific protocols like Influx Line Protocol.
Data Retention: Elasticsearch is typically used for data retention of short-to-medium term, where data is expected to be frequently updated or expire over time. It offers features like time-based indices and index lifecycle management to manage data retention and archiving. In contrast, InfluxDB is designed for long-term data retention, providing built-in retention policies and the ability to downsample or roll-up data to reduce storage requirements as time goes by.
Use Cases: Elasticsearch is widely used for various use cases beyond time-series data, such as full-text search, log analytics, and data exploration. It serves as a general-purpose distributed search and analytics engine, with a rich ecosystem of plugins and integrations. In comparison, InfluxDB's strength lies in storing and analyzing time-series data, making it a popular choice for monitoring, IoT data, sensor data, and analytics related to time-stamped events.
In Summary, Elasticsearch and InfluxDB differ in their data model, querying capabilities, scalability, data ingestion methods, data retention strategies, and use cases. They cater to different data storage and analysis needs, with Elasticsearch offering flexibility and powerful search features, while InfluxDB specializes in efficient handling of time-series data.
Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?
(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.
Thank you!
Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.
To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.
Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.
For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.
Hope this helps.
We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.
So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily
We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale, and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us a We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us better performance by far.
Druid is amazing for this use case and is a cloud-native solution that can be deployed on any cloud infrastructure or on Kubernetes. - Easy to scale horizontally - Column Oriented Database - SQL to query data - Streaming and Batch Ingestion - Native search indexes It has feature to work as TimeSeriesDB, Datawarehouse, and has Time-optimized partitioning.
if you want to find a serverless solution with capability of a lot of storage and SQL kind of capability then google bigquery is the best solution for that.
I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.
The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)
We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection
Pros of Elasticsearch
- Powerful api328
- Great search engine315
- Open source231
- Restful214
- Near real-time search200
- Free98
- Search everything85
- Easy to get started54
- Analytics45
- Distributed26
- Fast search6
- More than a search engine5
- Great docs4
- Awesome, great tool4
- Highly Available3
- Easy to scale3
- Potato2
- Document Store2
- Great customer support2
- Intuitive API2
- Nosql DB2
- Great piece of software2
- Reliable2
- Fast2
- Easy setup2
- Open1
- Easy to get hot data1
- Github1
- Elaticsearch1
- Actively developing1
- Responsive maintainers on GitHub1
- Ecosystem1
- Not stable1
- Scalability1
- Community0
Pros of InfluxDB
- Time-series data analysis59
- Easy setup, no dependencies30
- Fast, scalable & open source24
- Open source21
- Real-time analytics20
- Continuous Query support6
- Easy Query Language5
- HTTP API4
- Out-of-the-box, automatic Retention Policy4
- Offers Enterprise version1
- Free Open Source version1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elasticsearch
- Resource hungry7
- Diffecult to get started6
- Expensive5
- Hard to keep stable at large scale4
Cons of InfluxDB
- Instability4
- Proprietary query language1
- HA or Clustering is only in paid version1