StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Electron vs JavaFX

Electron vs JavaFX

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148
JavaFX
JavaFX
Stacks280
Followers418
Votes11

Electron vs JavaFX: What are the differences?

Key differences between Electron and JavaFX

Electron and JavaFX are both popular frameworks used for building desktop applications. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two:

  1. Language and Development Environment: Electron primarily uses web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it suitable for web developers. On the other hand, JavaFX uses Java, a widely-used programming language, which provides a robust and mature development environment with a rich set of libraries and tools.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Electron allows developers to build applications that can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms without significant code changes. In contrast, JavaFX applications can also be built to run on multiple platforms, but platform-specific code needs to be implemented for each platform, which could result in additional development efforts.

  3. Performance: JavaFX is known for its high-performance capabilities due to its close integration with the low-level systems. With Java's Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation and platform-specific optimizations, JavaFX applications can often achieve faster execution speeds compared to Electron applications.

  4. User Interface: Electron offers a rich selection of web-focused user interface components and styling options, making it easier to create modern and responsive interfaces. JavaFX, on the other hand, provides a wide range of native user interface controls and layout options, giving developers more control over the look and feel of their applications.

  5. Integration with Native Features: Electron allows easy integration with native features of the operating system, such as system notifications, file handlers, and automatic updates. While JavaFX also provides access to native APIs, it may require additional effort and platform-specific code to achieve similar levels of integration.

  6. Ecosystem and Community Support: Electron has a large and active community, offering a wide range of open-source plugins and libraries that extend its functionality. Its popularity in web development also means that finding resources and getting help is often easier. JavaFX, being a part of the Java ecosystem, benefits from a rich set of libraries and frameworks, and has a strong community support network.

In Summary, Electron and JavaFX differ in terms of the languages used, platform compatibility, performance, user interface options, integration with native features, and ecosystem support. Choosing between the two frameworks depends on the specific requirements, development skills, and target platform of the application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Electron
Electron
JavaFX
JavaFX

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
-
Statistics
Stacks
11.6K
Stacks
280
Followers
10.0K
Followers
418
Votes
148
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection
Pros
  • 11
    Light
Cons
  • 1
    Community support less than qt
  • 1
    Complicated

What are some alternatives to Electron, JavaFX?

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Element

Element

Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase