StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Enzyme vs Selenium

Enzyme vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
Enzyme
Enzyme
Stacks1.7K
Followers349
Votes0

Enzyme vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

Enzyme and Selenium are popular testing frameworks used for automation testing in web development. While they both serve the same purpose of testing web applications, there are some key differences between Enzyme and Selenium that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences and understand when to choose one over the other.

  1. Integration with Testing Libraries: Enzyme is a testing utility for React that allows developers to test React components in isolation by manipulating their props, state, and context. It provides a set of APIs specifically designed for React components, making it easier to test React applications.

Selenium, on the other hand, is a widely-used framework for web application testing. It supports multiple programming languages like Java, Python, and C#, and can be used to test various web frameworks, not just React. Selenium interacts with browsers using the browser's native support, which makes it compatible with different web technologies.

  1. DOM Manipulation: Enzyme provides a set of APIs that simulates user interactions and manipulates the virtual DOM. It allows developers to traverse, find, and manipulate React components' rendered output, making it easier to test the component's behavior.

Selenium, on the other hand, interacts with the real DOM of a web page. It provides APIs to locate elements within the web page, interact with them, and perform actions like clicking buttons or filling form fields.

  1. React-Specific Testing Features: Enzyme offers additional features specific to React testing, such as shallow rendering. Shallow rendering allows developers to test a component's behavior in isolation without rendering its child components. This helps in focusing on the component being tested and simplifies the test setup.

Selenium, being a general-purpose testing framework, does not have specific features tailored for React testing. It focuses on interacting with the web application as a user would, rather than testing React components in isolation.

  1. Setup and Configuration: Enzyme is easy to set up and use, especially for React applications. It provides a lightweight API and requires minimal configuration. Developers can quickly start writing tests without worrying about complex setup processes.

Selenium, on the other hand, requires a bit more setup and configuration, as it supports multiple programming languages and browser drivers. Developers need to install and configure the necessary drivers for the browsers they want to test on. This can take some time and may require additional dependencies.

  1. Parallel Execution: Enzyme does not offer built-in support for parallel test execution. Tests written using Enzyme are usually executed sequentially, which can be time-consuming for large test suites.

Selenium, on the other hand, supports parallel test execution out of the box. Tests can be executed concurrently on multiple browsers or browser instances, which can significantly reduce the overall test execution time.

In summary, Enzyme is a specialized testing utility for React applications that offers a simple API and specific features for testing React components. Selenium is a more general-purpose framework for testing web applications and is compatible with multiple programming languages and web technologies. Choose Enzyme when testing React components in isolation, while Selenium is suitable for testing various web technologies and performing end-to-end testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, Enzyme

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
Enzyme
Enzyme

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.

-
Shallow rendering; Full DOM rendering; Static rendered markup; React Hooks support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
1.7K
Followers
12.6K
Followers
349
Votes
527
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Enzyme?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana