Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ESLint vs Infer vs SonarQube: What are the differences?
# Introduction
## Key Differences between ESLint, Infer, and SonarQube
1. **Analysis Focus**: ESLint is focused on analyzing JavaScript code for potential errors and maintaining code consistency through coding rules. Infer, on the other hand, is designed for static analysis of C, C++, and Objective-C code to identify bugs and performance issues. SonarQube offers a more diverse range of functionalities, including code quality analysis, security vulnerability detection, and continuous inspection of various programming languages.
2. **Integration with CI/CD**: ESLint can be easily integrated into Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines to enforce code quality standards. Infer also provides integration options with various build systems and CI tools for automated code analysis. SonarQube excels in its integration capabilities with popular CI platforms like Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and GitHub Actions for seamless code analysis and quality management within the development workflow.
3. **Supported Languages**: ESLint is specifically tailored for analyzing JavaScript codebases. In contrast, Infer is primarily focused on supporting C, C++, and Objective-C languages. SonarQube, being a comprehensive code analysis tool, supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, PHP, and more.
4. **Code Coverage Analysis**: While ESLint and Infer primarily focus on static code analysis, SonarQube offers a holistic approach by including code coverage analysis to track the proportion of code exercised by automated tests. This feature helps in identifying untested code segments and improving overall code quality through effective test coverage.
5. **Community Support and Extensibility**: ESLint has a robust community backing, which continually contributes to the development of new rules and plugins to enhance code analysis capabilities. Infer also benefits from an active community that supports the tool's evolution and extension possibilities. Similarly, SonarQube provides a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and extensions to customize code analysis based on specific project requirements.
6. **Scalability and Enterprise Usage**: SonarQube stands out in terms of scalability and enterprise-grade usage with features like project portfolio management, centralized administration, and role-based access controls. ESLint and Infer are more suitable for smaller to mid-sized projects, whereas SonarQube caters to the needs of large organizations and complex codebases.
In Summary, the key differences between ESLint, Infer, and SonarQube lie in their analysis focus, integration capabilities, supported languages, code coverage analysis, community support, and scalability for enterprise usage.
Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.
It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.
I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.
And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).
Any recommendation is appreciated.
In the case of .js files I would recommend using both Eslint and Prettier.
You can set up Prettier as an Eslint rule using the following plugin:
https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier
And in order to avoid conflicts between Prettier and Eslint, you can use this config:
https://github.com/prettier/eslint-config-prettier
Which turns off all Eslint rules that are unnecessary or might conflict with Prettier.
you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.
while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.
prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.
i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.
for my teams i set it up like this: - eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support - eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it) - vscode workspace config: format on save - separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting - precommit hooks (husky)
so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)
Pura vida! Well, I had a similar issue and at the end I decided to use Stylelint + Prettier for that job, in our case, we wanted that our linting process includes the SCSS files and not only the JS file, base on that we concluded that using only ESLint to do both things wasn't the best option, so, we integrated prettier with Stylelint, and for that we used a neat plugin that allowed us to use Prettier inside Stylelint here is the link, https://github.com/prettier/stylelint-prettier#recommended-configuration, I hope that this can help you, hasta pronto!, :)
Pros of ESLint
- Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore8
- Free6
- IDE Integration6
- Customizable4
- Focuses code review on quality not style2
- Broad ecosystem of support & users2
Pros of Infer
Pros of SonarQube
- Tracks code complexity and smell trends26
- IDE Integration16
- Complete code Review9
- Difficult to deploy2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ESLint
Cons of Infer
Cons of SonarQube
- Sales process is long and unfriendly7
- Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful7
- Does not integrate with Snyk1