StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs SonarQube

ESLint vs SonarQube

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

ESLint vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

ESLint and SonarQube are popular code analysis tools used by developers and teams to ensure code quality and maintainability. Let's explore the key differences between ESLint and SonarQube:

  1. Features and Scope: ESLint is a JavaScript and TypeScript linter tool that enforces coding standards, catches bugs, and improves code quality. It focuses on code style and best practices. SonarQube, on the other hand, is a comprehensive code quality management platform supporting multiple languages. It provides static code analysis, security vulnerability detection, code coverage metrics, and more.

  2. Integration and Ecosystem: ESLint is lightweight, customizable, and integrates well with popular editors and build systems. It can be seamlessly integrated into development workflows and IDEs. SonarQube requires a dedicated server installation and offers advanced features like centralized reporting and historical analysis. It integrates with build systems, CI/CD pipelines, and code repositories.

  3. Code Analysis Capabilities: ESLint enforces coding standards, catches potential errors, and checks code consistency. It supports custom rules and plugins. SonarQube performs static code analysis, detects code smells, security vulnerabilities, code duplications, and provides in-depth insights into code quality metrics and complexity analysis.

  4. Reporting and Visualization: ESLint provides detailed reports and feedback within code editors, highlighting issues and suggesting fixes. SonarQube offers comprehensive dashboards and reports, providing a holistic view of code quality. It generates visualizations, metrics, and trends to track progress and prioritize code quality efforts.

  5. Community and Support: ESLint has a large community of JavaScript developers, extensive documentation, and an active GitHub repository. SonarQube also has a strong community, active development, and maintenance. It offers comprehensive documentation, forums, and community support.

In summary, ESLint is focused on JavaScript and TypeScript linting, enforcing coding standards, and catching potential errors, while SonarQube provides a more comprehensive code quality management platform with support for multiple languages and extensive analysis capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SonarQube, ESLint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
ESLint
ESLint

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
2.0K
Followers
14.0K
Votes
53
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Focuses code review on quality not style
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, ESLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana