StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Beta Testing Mobile App Distribution
  5. HockeyApp vs fastlane

HockeyApp vs fastlane

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HockeyApp
HockeyApp
Stacks164
Followers158
Votes38
fastlane
fastlane
Stacks716
Followers437
Votes74
GitHub Stars40.6K
Forks6.0K

HockeyApp vs fastlane: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Platforms: HockeyApp is primarily focused on providing a platform for beta distribution and crash reporting, while Fastlane is a set of tools used for automating the deployment process of iOS and Android apps. Fastlane supports multiple deployment platforms such as App Store, TestFlight, Google Play Store, etc., making it more versatile for developers.

  2. Integration with CI/CD Tools: Fastlane is popular for its seamless integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and Travis CI. It allows developers to automate the entire release process, including code signing, building, testing, and deployment, making it an ideal choice for continuous integration workflows.

  3. Configuration Complexity: Fastlane offers a more flexible and customizable approach to configuration through its Fastfile, where various actions can be defined using Ruby scripting. On the other hand, HockeyApp provides a simpler configuration process through its web interface, which may be more suitable for teams looking for a quick setup.

  4. Feature Set: HockeyApp focuses on providing essential features for beta testing and crash reporting, while Fastlane offers a wider range of tools and plugins for various tasks such as screenshots, code signing, and release automation. This difference in feature set makes Fastlane more suitable for complex app deployment scenarios.

  5. Community Support: Fastlane has a large and active community of developers contributing plugins, sharing best practices, and offering support on forums like GitHub and Stack Overflow. This vibrant community ensures that developers using Fastlane have access to a wealth of resources and solutions to common issues.

  6. Vendor Support: HockeyApp was acquired by Microsoft and is now part of Visual Studio App Center, providing users with integration with other Microsoft services. In contrast, Fastlane is an open-source project maintained by Google, ensuring continuous updates and improvements driven by community feedback and contributions.

In Summary, the key differences between HockeyApp and fastlane lie in their deployment platforms, integration with CI/CD tools, configuration complexity, feature set, community support, and vendor backing, making each tool suitable for different development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HockeyApp
HockeyApp
fastlane
fastlane

HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Crash Reports- HockeyApp offers the most reliable and complete crash reporting for beta and App Store versions using open source frameworks. Providing full server-side symbolication with class names, methods, line numbers, and automatic grouping of similar crash reports.;Feedback- HockeyApp allows you to communicate with your customers. Users can create a support request, post an idea, or discuss a problem right from within the app.;Distribution- Upload your beta versions to HockeyApp and distribute them to your beta testers. Integrate our open-source SDK and your app will automatically be able to detect updates and offer the updates right within the app.Analytics- By integrating our SDK into your app, you'll get advanced metrics to get a better overview of the testing for your app. See which devices were tested, which testers used the app for how long, and which language was tested.
Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
40.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.0K
Stacks
164
Stacks
716
Followers
158
Followers
437
Votes
38
Votes
74
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Crash analytics
  • 11
    Cross-platform
  • 5
    Mobile application distribution
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    JIRA Integration
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Itunes connect deployment
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 11
    Incredible flexability
  • 9
    Third party integrations
Integrations
Hipmob
Hipmob
Testmunk
Testmunk
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TestFlight
TestFlight
HipChat
HipChat
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
Hall
Hall

What are some alternatives to HockeyApp, fastlane?

TestFlight

TestFlight

With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.

Bitrise

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

TestFairy

TestFairy

When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.

Beta by Crashlytics

Beta by Crashlytics

A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers.

Codemagic

Codemagic

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

Fabric by Twitter

Fabric by Twitter

Installing and managing a wide range of SDKs can be cumbersome and complex. Fabric solves this problem by combining all seven of our SDKs under one roof and organizing them into three Kits: the Crashlytics Kit, the Twitter Kit, and the MoPub Kit.

Appcircle

Appcircle

Mobile CI/CD from small teams to on-premises Enterprise solutions, Appcircle is a mobile CI/CD platform that provides a fully automated environment to manage mobile app lifecycle end-to-end.

Distiller

Distiller

Distiller's hosted continuous integration platform takes the pain out of mobile development through automated build, test, and deployment of your iOS apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana