StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Flowdock vs Microsoft Teams

Flowdock vs Microsoft Teams

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flowdock
Flowdock
Stacks96
Followers81
Votes165
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes144

Flowdock vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Integration Capabilities: Flowdock offers a wide range of integrations with various tools and services, making it easy to connect with other platforms seamlessly. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams provides deep integration with other Microsoft products such as Outlook, SharePoint, and OneDrive, allowing for a more cohesive experience within the Microsoft ecosystem.

  2. Customization Options: Flowdock allows users to customize the interface with different themes, emojis, and notifications preferences to suit their preferences. In contrast, Microsoft Teams offers a higher level of customization with features like creating custom tabs, adding connectors, and integrating third-party apps directly into the platform.

  3. Collaboration Features: Flowdock focuses on streamlining communication through chat, threads, and shared inbox features, offering a more focused approach to collaboration. In contrast, Microsoft Teams provides a broader range of collaboration tools including document sharing, real-time co-authoring, and video conferencing, making it a more comprehensive platform for teamwork.

  4. Security and Compliance: Flowdock ensures data security through encryption and access controls, but it may not provide advanced compliance features required by highly regulated industries. Microsoft Teams, being part of the Microsoft 365 suite, offers advanced security measures, compliance features, and data loss prevention capabilities to meet the stringent requirements of corporate environments.

  5. File Storage and Management: Flowdock does not offer built-in file storage capabilities and relies on integrations with services like Google Drive or Dropbox for file management. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams provides native file storage and sharing options within the platform, making it more convenient for users to store, access, and collaborate on files.

  6. Scalability and Enterprise Readiness: Flowdock is well-suited for small to medium-sized teams looking for a simple and intuitive communication platform. In contrast, Microsoft Teams is designed for scalability and enterprise use, offering features like multi-factor authentication, advanced analytics, and enterprise-grade security to support large organizations with complex communication needs.

In Summary, Flowdock and Microsoft Teams differ in integration capabilities, customization options, collaboration features, security measures, file storage capabilities, and scalability, catering to different user needs and organizational requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flowdock, Microsoft Teams

carlche0616
carlche0616

Oct 11, 2020

Decided

As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.

197k views197k
Comments
Mohammad Hossein
Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planallay Sdn Bhd

Jan 17, 2020

Decided

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

266k views266k
Comments
Hirotaka
Hirotaka

Undergrad at DCSIL

Oct 7, 2020

Decided

Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.

  • Slack

We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.

  • Microsoft Teams

We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.

192k views192k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flowdock
Flowdock
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Team Inbox;Group Chat;1-On-1 Private Chat;Chat & Threads;Search All History;Notify and be notified;Mention someone by their @name;iOS and Android apps;Tags;Custom emoji;Notifications;File sharing;Tool integrations;Persistent history
All your content, tools, people, and conversations are available in the team workspace;Enjoy built-in access to SharePoint, OneNote, and Skype for Business;Work on documents right in the app
Statistics
Stacks
96
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
81
Followers
1.7K
Votes
165
Votes
144
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 34
    Threaded chat
  • 30
    Simpler integrations than others, team inbox = awesome
  • 18
    Great interface
  • 17
    Extremely easy to manage multiple conversations
  • 15
    Powerful Search and Tagging Architecture
Pros
  • 29
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
Cons
  • 17
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 10
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Heroku
Heroku
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Trello
Trello
Jira
Jira
Semaphore
Semaphore
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Woopra
Woopra
New Relic
New Relic
Skype
Skype

What are some alternatives to Flowdock, Microsoft Teams?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Let's Chat

Let's Chat

Let's Chat is a persistent messaging application that runs on Node.js and MongoDB. It's designed to be easily deployable and fits well with small, intimate teams. It's free (MIT licensed) and ships with killer features such as LDAP/Kerberos authentication, a REST-like API and XMPP support.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack