Forestry vs Storyblok: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Forestry and Storyblok

1. Content Modeling Approach: Forestry follows a traditional content modeling approach, allowing users to define content structure using front matter templates in Markdown files, while Storyblok offers a visual editor where users can easily create and modify content structures with a drag-and-drop interface. This difference caters to users' preferences for either a more technical or visual approach to content modeling.

2. Content Scheduling Capabilities: Forestry provides content scheduling functionality to plan and publish content in advance, ensuring timely updates and releases. In contrast, Storyblok lacks built-in content scheduling features, requiring users to rely on external tools or manual publishing to manage content publishing timelines effectively.

3. Assets Management: Forestry includes an asset manager to upload, organize, and use media files within the platform, simplifying the content creation process. Storyblok, on the other hand, focuses more on content management and lacks robust asset management features, making it less ideal for projects heavily reliant on media assets.

4. Content Localization: Storyblok offers comprehensive support for multilingual content management, allowing users to create and manage content in multiple languages within a single project. While Forestry supports localization, it may require additional setup and integration with external services for full multilingual content support, making Storyblok a more convenient option for global content projects.

5. Collaboration Tools: Forestry provides collaborative features such as roles and permissions settings, allowing teams to work together on content creation and management efficiently. In comparison, Storyblok lacks advanced collaboration tools, which may limit teamwork capabilities and user access control within the platform.

6. Integration Ecosystem: Storyblok offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools and services, enabling users to extend the platform's functionality and connect with other systems seamlessly. While Forestry also supports integrations, Storyblok's extensive integration ecosystem provides users with more flexibility and options for enhancing their content management workflows.

In Summary, Forestry and Storyblok differ in their content modeling approach, content scheduling capabilities, assets management, content localization support, collaboration tools, and integration ecosystem.