Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gearman

75
144
+ 1
45
IronMQ

35
49
+ 1
36
Add tool

Gearman vs IronMQ: What are the differences?

What is Gearman? A generic application framework to farm out work to other machines or processes. Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

What is IronMQ? Message Queue for any deployment. An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

Gearman and IronMQ belong to "Message Queue" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Gearman are:

  • Open Source It’s free! (in both meanings of the word) Gearman has an active open source community that is easy to get involved with if you need help or want to contribute. Worried about licensing? Gearman is BSD
  • Multi-language - There are interfaces for a number of languages, and this list is growing. You also have the option to write heterogeneous applications with clients submitting work in one language and workers performing that work in another
  • Flexible - You are not tied to any specific design pattern. You can quickly put together distributed applications using any model you choose, one of those options being Map/Reduce

On the other hand, IronMQ provides the following key features:

  • Instant High Availability- Runs on top cloud infrastructures and uses multiple high-availability data centers. Uses reliable datastores for message durability and persistence.
  • Easy to Use- IronMQ is super easy to use. Simply connect directly to the API endpoints and you're ready to create and use queues. There are also client libraries available in any language you want – Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, .NET, Go, Node.JS, and more
  • Scalable / High Performance- Built using high-performance languages designed for concurrency and runs on industrial-strength clouds. Push messages and stream data at will without worrying about memory limits or adding more servers.

"Free" is the primary reason why developers consider Gearman over the competitors, whereas "Great Support" was stated as the key factor in picking IronMQ.

According to the StackShare community, Gearman has a broader approval, being mentioned in 19 company stacks & 5 developers stacks; compared to IronMQ, which is listed in 9 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Gearman
Pros of IronMQ
  • 11
    Ease of use and very simple APIs
  • 11
    Free
  • 6
    Polyglot
  • 5
    No single point of failure
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 3
    High-throughput
  • 2
    Foreground & background processing
  • 2
    Very fast
  • 1
    Different Programming Languages Channel
  • 1
    Many supported programming languages
  • 12
    Great Support
  • 8
    Heroku Add-on
  • 3
    Push support
  • 3
    Delayed delivery upto 7 days
  • 2
    Super fast
  • 2
    Language agnostic
  • 2
    Good analytics/monitoring
  • 2
    Ease of configuration
  • 2
    GDPR Compliant

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Gearman
Cons of IronMQ
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Can't use rabbitmqadmin

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Gearman?

    Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

    What is IronMQ?

    An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Gearman?
    What companies use IronMQ?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Gearman or IronMQ.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Gearman?
    What tools integrate with IronMQ?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Gearman and IronMQ?
    RabbitMQ
    RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
    Kafka
    Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
    Celery
    Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
    Redis
    Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
    Beanstalkd
    Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.
    See all alternatives