Gerrit Code Review vs Gitolite

Overview

Gitolite

Stacks38

Followers87

Votes12

GitHub Stars8.5K

Forks1.0K

Gerrit Code Review

Stacks116

Followers223

Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Gitolite: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Integration with Git: Gerrit Code Review is a web-based tool that sits on top of Git and provides a platform for reviewing and submitting code changes. Gitolite, on the other hand, is a lightweight access control layer for Git, which allows for fine-grained permission management but does not provide specific review functionality.
Key Difference 2: Workflow Management: Gerrit Code Review offers a comprehensive workflow management system that includes features such as code review, CI/CD integration, and change approval processes. Gitolite, being primarily an access control layer, does not provide built-in workflow management capabilities.
Key Difference 3: User Interface: Gerrit Code Review has a rich web-based user interface that allows users to view and manage code changes, leave comments, and interact with the code review process. Gitolite, on the other hand, does not have a dedicated user interface and is primarily managed through the command line.
Key Difference 4: Access Control: Gitolite excels in access control management by allowing fine-grained permission configuration at the repository and branch level. Gerrit Code Review also provides access control features, but they are more focused on governing the code review process rather than granular access control management.
Key Difference 5: Code Review Features: Gerrit Code Review provides a comprehensive set of code review features, including inline commenting, voting, and integration with CI/CD systems. Gitolite does not have built-in code review functionality and relies on external tools or processes for code review.
Key Difference 6: Collaboration: Gerrit Code Review enables multiple developers to collaborate on code changes by providing a central platform for code review and discussion. Gitolite, as an access control layer, does not have built-in collaboration features and requires developers to rely on external communication channels for collaboration.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review and Gitolite differ in their integration with Git, workflow management capabilities, user interface, access control management, code review features, and collaboration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gitolite	Gerrit Code Review
Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.	Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.
Use a single unix user ("real" user) on the server.;Provide access to many gitolite users: they are not "real" users, so they do not get shell access.;Control access to many git repositories: read access controlled at the repo level, and write access controlled at the branch/tag/file/directory level, including who can rewind, create, and delete branches/tags.;Can be installed without root access, assuming git and perl are already installed.;Authentication is most commonly done using sshd, but you can also use "smart http" mode if you prefer (this may require root access to setup).	git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 38	Stacks 116
Followers 87	Followers 223
Votes 12	Votes 67
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Easy setup 4 Fine-tuned per-branch permissions 1 Really easy setup 1 Free 1 Free multi-server mirroring Cons 1 Doesn't have any user interface 1 No tools for project and issue tracker 1 Antiquated	Pros 14 Code review 12 Good workflow 11 Cleaner repository story 10 Open source 10 Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
No integrations available	Git

What are some alternatives to Gitolite, Gerrit Code Review?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

Gerrit Code Review vs Gitolite: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Integration with Git: Gerrit Code Review is a web-based tool that sits on top of Git and provides a platform for reviewing and submitting code changes. Gitolite, on the other hand, is a lightweight access control layer for Git, which allows for fine-grained permission management but does not provide specific review functionality.
Key Difference 2: Workflow Management: Gerrit Code Review offers a comprehensive workflow management system that includes features such as code review, CI/CD integration, and change approval processes. Gitolite, being primarily an access control layer, does not provide built-in workflow management capabilities.
Key Difference 3: User Interface: Gerrit Code Review has a rich web-based user interface that allows users to view and manage code changes, leave comments, and interact with the code review process. Gitolite, on the other hand, does not have a dedicated user interface and is primarily managed through the command line.
Key Difference 4: Access Control: Gitolite excels in access control management by allowing fine-grained permission configuration at the repository and branch level. Gerrit Code Review also provides access control features, but they are more focused on governing the code review process rather than granular access control management.
Key Difference 5: Code Review Features: Gerrit Code Review provides a comprehensive set of code review features, including inline commenting, voting, and integration with CI/CD systems. Gitolite does not have built-in code review functionality and relies on external tools or processes for code review.
Key Difference 6: Collaboration: Gerrit Code Review enables multiple developers to collaborate on code changes by providing a central platform for code review and discussion. Gitolite, as an access control layer, does not have built-in collaboration features and requires developers to rely on external communication channels for collaboration.

Gerrit Code Review vs Gitolite

Overview