StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Gitea vs Gogs

Gitea vs Gogs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gogs
Gogs
Stacks175
Followers306
Votes182
Gitea
Gitea
Stacks322
Followers448
Votes123
GitHub Stars51.8K
Forks6.2K

Gitea vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Gitea and Gogs are both self-hosted Git service providers that offer a lightweight and decentralized alternative to platforms like GitHub. While they share several similarities, there are important differences that set them apart.

  1. Performance: Gitea is known for its exceptional performance, making it the preferred choice for large-scale projects with heavy traffic. On the other hand, Gogs might struggle to handle the same level of workload efficiently.

  2. Community Support: Gitea boasts a larger and more active community compared to Gogs. This translates to better community-driven support, a wider range of plugins and extensions, and faster bug fixes.

  3. Interface: Gogs provides a simpler and more straightforward user interface, making it easier to navigate and get started. Gitea offers a more feature-rich interface with additional customization options, making it ideal for advanced users.

  4. Authentication Methods: Gitea supports a broader range of authentication methods, including LDAP, OAuth2, and reverse proxy, providing more flexibility for integration with existing systems. Gogs, on the other hand, has limited authentication options, primarily relying on username/password or SSH key authentication.

  5. Development and Updates: Gitea has a more active development cycle and releases updates more frequently, ensuring that users have access to the latest features and bug fixes. Gogs, while still actively maintained, has a slower release schedule and may not receive updates as frequently.

  6. Integration with Other Tools: Gitea has better integration capabilities, allowing users to easily connect and sync with popular applications like Jenkins, Slack, and Zulip. Gogs, on the other hand, has limited integration options, primarily focused on basic Git functionalities.

In summary, Gitea offers superior performance, a larger community, and more advanced features compared to Gogs. However, Gogs provides a simpler interface and may be more suitable for smaller projects or users looking for a lightweight solution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gogs, Gitea

Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gogs
Gogs
Gitea
Gitea

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
175
Stacks
322
Followers
306
Followers
448
Votes
182
Votes
123
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Self-hosted github like service
  • 31
    Very low memory footprint
  • 29
    Easy to install / update
  • 17
    Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi
  • 16
    Single binary deploy no dependencies
Pros
  • 24
    Self-hosted
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 15
    Free
  • 12
    Simple
  • 9
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 3
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 0
    Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
No integrations available
Raspberry Pi
Raspberry Pi
DingTalk
DingTalk
Discord
Discord
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Vagrant
Vagrant
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Gogs, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana