Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GitHub Actions

23.7K
2.8K
+ 1
27
Heroku CI

92
132
+ 1
5
Add tool

Github Actions vs Heroku CI: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with platform: GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, allowing seamless automation of workflows within the same ecosystem. On the other hand, Heroku CI is specifically designed for continuous integration and deployment on the Heroku platform, providing native support for deploying applications to Heroku.

  2. Pricing: GitHub Actions offers a generous free tier for public repositories and limited usage on private repositories, with additional costs based on usage beyond the limits. In comparison, Heroku CI is an addon service provided by Heroku, with pricing based on the number of test runs and parallel test instances required.

  3. Scalability: GitHub Actions provides scalable workflows that can be easily customized and managed for projects of any size, with the ability to run parallel jobs concurrently. Heroku CI, being a platform-specific tool, is more limited in scalability compared to GitHub Actions.

  4. Customizability: GitHub Actions allows for extensive customization using YAML-based configuration files, offering flexibility in defining workflows, triggers, and actions. Heroku CI, while providing some customization options, may be more restrictive in terms of configuration compared to GitHub Actions.

  5. Environment support: GitHub Actions supports a wide range of operating systems, programming languages, and tools, allowing developers to build and test applications in diverse environments. In contrast, Heroku CI is primarily focused on supporting applications deployed on the Heroku platform, which may limit the scope of environments that can be tested.

  6. Deployment capabilities: While both GitHub Actions and Heroku CI enable continuous integration and deployment workflows, GitHub Actions can be used to deploy applications to various platforms beyond just Heroku, providing more flexibility in deployment options compared to Heroku CI.

In Summary, GitHub Actions and Heroku CI differ in terms of platform integration, pricing, scalability, customizability, environment support, and deployment capabilities.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of GitHub Actions
Pros of Heroku CI
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 2
    Configs stored in .github
  • 2
    Docker Support
  • 2
    Read actions in Marketplace
  • 1
    Active Development Roadmap
  • 1
    Fast
  • 3
    No waiting in the queue
  • 1
    Best in class pipeline integration
  • 1
    Consolidated Heroku billing

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GitHub Actions
Cons of Heroku CI
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No Deployment Projects
  • 1
    No manual launch
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is GitHub Actions?

    It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

    What is Heroku CI?

    On every push to GitHub, Heroku CI runs your tests in a disposable Heroku app, so there’s never a wait time for a free CI worker. Tests run fast, on Performance dynos.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention GitHub Actions and Heroku CI as a desired skillset
    What companies use GitHub Actions?
    What companies use Heroku CI?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with GitHub Actions?
    What tools integrate with Heroku CI?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to GitHub Actions and Heroku CI?
    CircleCI
    Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    Azure Pipelines
    Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.
    GitLab CI
    GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    See all alternatives