Google Anthos vs Platform.sh: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Anthos and Platform.sh are two popular cloud computing platforms that offer various services for managing and deploying applications. Below are the key differences between Google Anthos and Platform.sh.

1. Deployment Flexibility: Google Anthos provides a hybrid and multi-cloud approach, allowing users to manage applications across various environments, including on-premises, Google Cloud, and other cloud providers. On the other hand, Platform.sh focuses primarily on providing a Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution for web application deployment, which means users have limited flexibility in choosing deployment environments.

2. Service Integrations: Google Anthos integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud services such as Kubernetes Engine, Istio, and Stackdriver, providing a comprehensive set of tools for application management and monitoring. In contrast, Platform.sh offers a more streamlined platform with built-in support for popular technologies like PHP, Node.js, and Java, but may have fewer integrations with third-party services compared to Google Anthos.

3. Scalability Options: Google Anthos is designed for scalability and can easily scale applications horizontally or vertically based on demand, offering a high level of flexibility for resource allocation. Platform.sh also supports scalability features, but the options may be more limited compared to Google Anthos, especially in terms of managing complex distributed systems.

4. Infrastructure Management: Google Anthos includes tools for managing infrastructure resources and configurations, allowing users to define and control various aspects of their cloud environments. In comparison, Platform.sh abstracts much of the infrastructure management, focusing more on simplifying the deployment process and providing a user-friendly interface for developers.

5. Cost Structure: Google Anthos follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the resources they use, making it a cost-effective option for scaling applications as needed. Platform.sh also offers a flexible pricing structure based on the number of projects and resources, but the overall costs may vary depending on the specific requirements of the application.

In Summary, Google Anthos offers more deployment flexibility, extensive service integrations, and advanced scalability options compared to Platform.sh, which focuses on streamlined deployment processes, simplified infrastructure management, and cost-effective pricing for web applications.