Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?
Introduction:
AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine are both Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings that allow developers to quickly deploy and manage their applications on the cloud. However, there are key differences between the two services that make them suitable for different use cases.
Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility in terms of infrastructure options. It allows developers to customize the underlying infrastructure, choose from a wide range of EC2 instance types, and integrate with other AWS services. On the other hand, Google App Engine abstracts away the infrastructure details and provides automatic scalability, making it easier to scale applications without worrying about provisioning and managing resources.
Pricing Model: AWS Elastic Beanstalk follows an a-la-carte pricing model, where each AWS resource (such as EC2 instances, S3 buckets, etc.) is billed separately. This gives developers more control over cost optimization, but requires more management and monitoring. In contrast, Google App Engine has a more bundled pricing model, where the cost includes both infrastructure and platform services. This can make it simpler to estimate costs, but may be less flexible for organizations with specific resource needs.
Supported Languages and Runtimes: AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers support for a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and runtimes such as Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, Ruby, and more. It provides a more language-agnostic approach, making it suitable for multi-language environments. On the other hand, Google App Engine focuses more on specific languages and runtimes, primarily supporting Java, Python, Go, and Node.js. It provides tighter integration with Google Cloud services, but may be less suitable for organizations with diverse technology stacks.
Deployment Process: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides more flexibility in terms of deployment options. It supports various deployment methods such as direct file uploads, Git integration, Docker containers, and more. This allows developers to choose the most suitable deployment process for their applications. In contrast, Google App Engine has a more streamlined deployment process, focusing on deploying code using Google Cloud SDK or through integration with popular development tools such as Maven or Gradle.
Monitoring and Logging: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides detailed monitoring and logging capabilities through integration with AWS CloudWatch. It allows developers to collect, monitor, and analyze application logs and performance metrics. Google App Engine also provides monitoring and logging features, but it leverages Google Cloud Monitoring and Google Cloud Logging services for this purpose. The choice between the two services may depend on the organization's existing monitoring and logging infrastructure.
In Summary, AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility and customization options, a la carte pricing, and support for a wide range of languages and runtimes. Google App Engine, on the other hand, provides automatic scalability, bundled pricing, closer integration with Google Cloud services, and a streamlined deployment process. The choice between the two services depends on the specific needs and preferences of the organization.
Platform.sh has great out-of-the-box support for PHP apps (especially Symfony, as it was made by the same people). Elastic Beanstalk does not have a lot of compelling PaaS features like Platform.sh. There, you have to install a lot of PHP extensions manually for example, while Platform.sh just handles it for you based on your config. Elastic Beanstalk also has terrible version updates (see link).
Pros of AWS Elastic Beanstalk
- Integrates with other aws services77
- Simple deployment65
- Fast44
- Painless28
- Free16
- Well-documented4
- Independend app container3
- Postgres hosting2
- Ability to be customized2
Pros of Google App Engine
- Easy to deploy145
- Auto scaling106
- Good free plan80
- Easy management62
- Scalability56
- Low cost35
- Comprehensive set of features32
- All services in one place28
- Simple scaling22
- Quick and reliable cloud servers19
- Granular Billing6
- Easy to develop and unit test5
- Monitoring gives comprehensive set of key indicators5
- Really easy to quickly bring up a full stack3
- Create APIs quickly with cloud endpoints3
- No Ops2
- Mostly up2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS Elastic Beanstalk
- Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota2
- Lots of moving parts and config1
- Slow deployments0