Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Hoppscotch vs Postman: What are the differences?
Hoppscotch and Postman are both popular tools used for testing and working with APIs. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.
Interface: Hoppscotch offers a cleaner and more user-friendly interface compared to Postman. It has a minimalistic design that focuses on simplicity, making it easier to navigate and use.
Installation: Postman requires users to install an application on their device, whereas Hoppscotch is a web-based tool that can be accessed directly from a web browser. This allows for easier and quicker access without the need for installation.
Features: Postman offers a wide range of features, including automated testing, documentation generation, and team collaboration. On the other hand, Hoppscotch focuses on providing a simple and intuitive interface for making HTTP requests. It lacks some of the advanced features offered by Postman.
Customization: Postman allows users to customize their requests and add more complex workflows using pre-request and post-request scripts. Hoppscotch, on the other hand, does not offer this level of customization and is more suited for simpler and straightforward requests.
Integrations: Postman integrates with a variety of tools and platforms, including version control systems, test automation tools, and API documentation generators. Hoppscotch, on the other hand, has limited integrations available at the moment.
Community Support: Postman has a larger and more established community compared to Hoppscotch. This means that there are more resources, tutorials, and community support available for Postman users.
In summary, Hoppscotch and Postman differ in their interface, installation method, features, customization options, integrations, and community support. While Postman offers a more comprehensive set of features and integrations, Hoppscotch focuses on simplicity and ease of use.
Pros of Hoppscotch
- Can be self hosted4
- Open Source4
- Great UI4
- Improving Quickly3
- Good community1
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Hoppscotch
- Can't set environment vars form post request script1
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1