StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Hudson vs TeamCity

Hudson vs TeamCity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Hudson
Hudson
Stacks12
Followers18
Votes0

Hudson vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Integration with Git**: The key difference between Hudson and TeamCity is how they integrate with Git. TeamCity has better native support for Git compared to Hudson, offering more features like branch spec mapping, quiet period for triggers, and built-in pull request support.
2. **Built-in tools**: TeamCity comes with a variety of built-in tools and plugins that make it a more comprehensive solution out of the box compared to Hudson. These tools include code coverage, duplication finder, and integrated code inspections.
3. **Build Chains**: TeamCity offers a feature called build chains, which allows users to create more complex build workflows compared to Hudson. With build chains, users can define dependencies between different builds to ensure they are executed in the right order.
4. **User Interface**: TeamCity has a more modern and user-friendly interface compared to Hudson, making it easier for users to navigate and configure their builds. The user interface in TeamCity is also highly customizable, allowing users to tailor it to their specific needs.
5. **Remote Run**: TeamCity offers a unique feature called remote run, which allows developers to trigger a build on the CI server directly from their IDE. This can significantly improve the development workflow by enabling developers to quickly test their changes without leaving their development environment.
6. **Build Failure Conditions**: TeamCity provides more advanced build failure conditions compared to Hudson, allowing users to set up rules for when a build should be marked as failed. This can help teams maintain a higher quality codebase by catching issues early in the development process.

In Summary, Hudson and TeamCity differ in their integration with Git, built-in tools, build chains, user interface, remote run capabilities, and build failure conditions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Hudson
Hudson

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

It monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently it focuses on the two jobs

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Easy installation; Easy configuration; Change set support; Permanent links; RSS/E-mail/IM Integration; After-the-fact tagging; JUnit/TestNG test reporting; Distributed builds; File fingerprinting; Plugin Support
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
12
Followers
1.1K
Followers
18
Votes
316
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    Github integration
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 2
    User friendly
  • 2
    User-friendly
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
JavaScript
JavaScript
Java
Java
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Hudson?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana