StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs Testrail

Jenkins vs Testrail

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Testrail
Testrail
Stacks218
Followers265
Votes30

Jenkins vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Jenkins and TestRail

Jenkins and TestRail are both popular tools in the software development and testing industry. While Jenkins focuses on continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD), TestRail is a test management solution. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Integration Workflow: Jenkins is primarily used for building and deploying software across various environments. It automates the development workflow, integrating code changes and creating build packages. On the other hand, TestRail provides comprehensive test management capabilities, including test case creation, execution tracking, and reporting.

  2. Purpose: Jenkins is designed to provide a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline, allowing developers to automate building, testing, and deploying applications. TestRail, on the other hand, focuses on managing and organizing software testing efforts, helping testers create, track, and analyze test cases.

  3. Testing Environment: Jenkins is capable of managing and running unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests as part of the CI/CD pipeline. It supports multiple programming languages and frameworks. TestRail, on the other hand, does not execute tests directly but provides a central repository for test cases, allowing testers to organize, prioritize, and execute test cases in various test environments.

  4. Reporting and Metrics: Jenkins provides basic reporting functionality, generating build logs and displaying test results. However, TestRail offers advanced reporting and metrics capabilities. It allows users to generate detailed reports, track test coverage, identify trends, and measure the overall quality of the testing process.

  5. Integration with Test Automation Frameworks: Jenkins has robust integration capabilities and supports various test automation frameworks, allowing users to incorporate automated tests into the CI/CD pipeline easily. TestRail, on the other hand, does not provide direct integration with test automation frameworks but can be used alongside them to manage the testing process and track test results.

  6. User Roles and Permissions: TestRail offers role-based access control, allowing administrators to define specific user roles with different permissions for accessing and modifying test cases. Jenkins, on the other hand, does not have built-in user roles and permissions but can be integrated with external authentication systems.

In Summary, Jenkins is primarily a CI/CD tool focused on building and deploying software, while TestRail is a test management solution that offers comprehensive capabilities for organizing and tracking test cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Testrail

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Testrail
Testrail

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Efficiently manage test cases, plans and runs;Boost testing productivity significantly;Get real-time insights into your testing progress;Integrates with your issue tracker & test automation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
218
Followers
50.4K
Followers
265
Votes
2.2K
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 10
    Designed for testers
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    Intutive
  • 5
    Easy Intergration
  • 3
    Customer Support
Cons
  • 4
    Pricey
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Jira
Jira
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Mantis
Mantis
Redmine
Redmine
Gemini
Gemini
Bugzilla
Bugzilla

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Testrail?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana