StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Jest vs Selenium

Jest vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jest
Jest
Stacks15.2K
Followers4.1K
Votes175
Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K

Jest vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Jest and Selenium are two popular tools used for testing in web development. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Syntax: Jest is a JavaScript testing framework that uses a simple and intuitive syntax for writing test cases. It provides a wide range of built-in functions and utilities, making it easy to write tests. On the other hand, Selenium is a testing framework that relies on the use of different languages, such as Java, Python, and JavaScript. The syntax may vary depending on the language used, making it less straightforward for developers who are not familiar with multiple programming languages.

  2. Testing Scope: Jest is primarily designed for unit testing, focusing on testing individual units of code in isolation. It provides tools for mocking dependencies and simulating different scenarios. Selenium, on the other hand, is more suitable for end-to-end testing. It allows developers to automate the interaction between a web browser and a web application, enabling comprehensive testing of the user interface and functionality.

  3. Test Environment: Jest provides a complete testing environment out of the box. It comes with a built-in test runner, assertion libraries, and mocking utilities. This means that developers can start writing and running tests immediately without any additional setup. In contrast, Selenium requires a bit more setup as it relies on the WebDriver API to interact with web browsers. Developers need to configure and manage the WebDriver for the desired browser, which can be a more involved process.

  4. Performance: Jest is known for its fast and efficient test execution. It implements parallelization and optimization techniques to run tests in parallel, resulting in shorter testing time. Selenium, on the other hand, may be slower in execution due to the nature of end-to-end testing. It involves launching a web browser, loading the application, and interacting with different elements, which can considerably increase the testing time, especially for complex applications.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Jest has gained significant popularity and has a thriving community of developers. It has extensive documentation, a rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions, and great community support. Selenium also has a strong community support with a wide range of resources available, but it may not be as extensive as the Jest community. Additionally, Jest's popularity has led to its adoption in various frameworks and libraries, making it easily integratable with other tools.

  6. Browser Compatibility: Selenium is capable of automating tests across multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. It provides a consistent testing experience across different browsers, ensuring compatibility. Jest, however, is primarily designed for testing JavaScript code and does not provide extensive cross-browser testing capabilities out of the box. Developers may need to use other tools or services to achieve comprehensive cross-browser testing with Jest.

In summary, Jest is great for unit testing with its simple syntax, fast execution, and extensive community support, while Selenium excels in end-to-end testing with its cross-browser compatibility and web browser interaction capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jest, Selenium

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jest
Jest
Selenium
Selenium

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Familiar Approach: Built on top of the Jasmine test framework, using familiar expect(value).toBe(other) assertions;Mock by Default: Automatically mocks CommonJS modules returned by require(), making most existing code testable;Short Feedback Loop: DOM APIs are mocked and tests run in parallel via a small node.js command line utility
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
Stacks
15.2K
Stacks
16.2K
Followers
4.1K
Followers
12.6K
Votes
175
Votes
527
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Open source
  • 32
    Mock by default makes testing much simpler
  • 23
    Testing React Native Apps
  • 20
    Parallel test running
  • 16
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Ambiguous configuration
  • 4
    Documentation
  • 3
    Difficult
  • 2
    Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting
  • 2
    Difficult to run single test/describe/file
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers

What are some alternatives to Jest, Selenium?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana