StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. Jib vs Spinnaker

Jib vs Spinnaker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Stacks233
Followers358
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.2K
Jib
Jib
Stacks17
Followers43
Votes2
GitHub Stars14.1K
Forks1.5K

Jib vs Spinnaker: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Jib and Spinnaker, two popular tools used in the software development and deployment process.

  1. Build Process: Jib is primarily focused on the build process, as it is a Java container image builder that allows developers to efficiently build container images for their Java applications. On the other hand, Spinnaker is a continuous delivery platform that primarily focuses on automated deployment, delivering features and applications to production environments.

  2. Integration with Build Tools: Jib integrates seamlessly with popular build tools like Maven and Gradle, allowing developers to easily build container images as part of their existing build processes without requiring Dockerfiles or a separate Docker daemon. Spinnaker, on the other hand, integrates with different build tools but does not specifically focus on the build process itself.

  3. Container Orchestration Support: Jib is primarily designed for building container images, but it does not directly interact with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. It focuses on generating optimized container images that can be easily deployed to any container runtime. In contrast, Spinnaker provides native support for popular container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, simplifying the deployment and management of containerized applications.

  4. Deployment Strategies: While Jib focuses mainly on the build process, it does not provide extensive deployment strategies or built-in blue-green or Canary deployment capabilities. Spinnaker, being a continuous delivery platform, offers various deployment strategies like blue-green deployments, rolling deployments, and canary deployments, enhancing the control and flexibility over the release process.

  5. Visibility and Monitoring: Jib does not provide built-in monitoring or visibility features, as it primarily focuses on generating optimized container images. On the other hand, Spinnaker offers robust monitoring and visibility capabilities, allowing developers and operations teams to monitor application performance, logs, and metrics, aiding in troubleshooting and performance optimization.

  6. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: Jib can be easily integrated with existing CI/CD pipelines as a build plugin, seamlessly fitting into the overall software development and deployment workflow. Spinnaker itself is a powerful continuous delivery platform that can serve as the backbone of CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated deployments, release management, and advanced deployment strategies.

In summary, Jib is primarily focused on the build process, provides easy integration with build tools, and generates optimized container images, while Spinnaker is a robust continuous delivery platform that supports container orchestration, advanced deployment strategies, and provides monitoring and visibility features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Jib
Jib

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Jib builds Docker and OCI images for your Java applications and is available as plugins for Maven and Gradle.

-
Fast - Deploy your changes fast. Jib separates your application into multiple layers, splitting dependencies from classes. Now you don’t have to wait for Docker to rebuild your entire Java application - just deploy the layers that changed.; Reproducible - Rebuilding your container image with the same contents always generates the same image. Never trigger an unnecessary update again.; Daemonless - Reduce your CLI dependencies. Build your Docker image from within Maven or Gradle and push to any registry of your choice. No more writing Dockerfiles and calling docker build/push.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Stars
14.1K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
233
Stacks
17
Followers
358
Followers
43
Votes
14
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Mature
Cons
  • 3
    No GitOps
  • 1
    Management overhead
  • 1
    Ease of use
  • 1
    Configuration time
Pros
  • 2
    No docker files to maintain
  • 0
    Build is faster than Docker
  • 0
    Native
  • 0
    Coder friendly with Maven and Gradle plugins
Integrations
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Packer
Packer
Prometheus
Prometheus
Chef
Chef
Jenkins
Jenkins
Docker
Docker
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Java
Java
Gradle
Gradle

What are some alternatives to Spinnaker, Jib?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana