StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. jQWidgets vs jQuery

jQWidgets vs jQuery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

jQWidgets vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between jQWidgets and jQuery. jQWidgets and jQuery are both popular JavaScript libraries used for creating interactive and responsive web applications. While they have some similarities, there are several important differences that set them apart.

  1. Development Focus: jQWidgets is primarily focused on providing a comprehensive set of UI widgets and controls for building modern web applications. It offers a wide range of ready-to-use UI components, such as charts, grids, menus, and input controls. On the other hand, jQuery is a more general-purpose JavaScript library that provides a simplified and concise way of manipulating HTML documents, handling events, and making AJAX requests.

  2. Ease of Use: jQuery is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It provides a concise and intuitive syntax for selecting and manipulating HTML elements, making it suitable for beginners and developers with limited JavaScript knowledge. jQWidgets, on the other hand, offers a more advanced and feature-rich API for working with its UI components, which may require a steeper learning curve for developers.

  3. Design and Customizability: jQWidgets emphasizes on providing visually appealing and customizable UI components. It offers a wide range of themes and styles, allowing developers to easily customize the appearance of their web applications. jQuery, on the other hand, does not focus specifically on UI design and appearance. While it does provide some basic CSS manipulation functions, it lacks the extensive customization options offered by jQWidgets.

  4. Compatibility and Browser Support: jQWidgets is designed to be compatible with modern web browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. It also supports both desktop and mobile platforms, making it suitable for cross-platform development. jQuery, being a widely-used JavaScript library, enjoys excellent compatibility and browser support. It works well across all major web browsers and is also compatible with older versions of Internet Explorer.

  5. Community and Support: jQuery has a large and active community of developers, which means a wealth of online resources, tutorials, and plugins are available. It's also supported by the jQuery Foundation, which provides documentation and support for the library. jQWidgets also has a dedicated community and offers documentation and support, but it may not have as extensive resources and community support as jQuery.

  6. Price and Licensing: jQuery is an open-source library released under the MIT license, which means it can be used for free in both personal and commercial projects. jQWidgets, on the other hand, follows a dual licensing model. While it offers a community edition that is free for non-commercial use, commercial usage requires purchasing a commercial license.

Summary

In summary, jQWidgets and jQuery have different focuses and target different needs. jQWidgets provides a comprehensive set of UI widgets and emphasizes on design and customizability, whereas jQuery is a more general-purpose library for manipulating HTML documents and handling events. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the developer's familiarity with the respective libraries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery, jQWidgets

Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments
kazi
kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k
Comments
Manatsawin
Manatsawin

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
jQWidgets
jQWidgets

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

-
Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
14
Followers
70.6K
Followers
49
Votes
6.6K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
Integrations
No integrations available
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
PHP
PHP
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5
Spring MVC
Spring MVC

What are some alternatives to jQuery, jQWidgets?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase