StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Karate DSL vs Test Studio

Karate DSL vs Test Studio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Test Studio
Test Studio
Stacks2
Followers17
Votes0
GitHub Stars2
Forks11
Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Stacks148
Followers268
Votes85

Karate DSL vs Test Studio: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare and highlight the key differences between Karate DSL and Test Studio.

  1. Execution Environment: Karate DSL uses a Java-based framework and can be executed on any platform that supports Java, such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Test Studio is a Microsoft Windows-based product and can only be executed on Windows operating systems.

  2. Scripting Language: Karate DSL uses a simplified version of the Gherkin language, which is a business-readable domain-specific language for expressing behavior in a natural language format. It allows users to write tests using a combination of plain English phrases and structured statements. Test Studio, on the other hand, uses C# as its scripting language, allowing users to leverage the full power of an object-oriented programming language.

  3. Integration and Extensibility: Karate DSL provides built-in support for API testing, web automation, and performance testing, making it a versatile tool for end-to-end testing. It also allows users to extend its functionality by writing custom Java code. Test Studio, on the other hand, focuses primarily on web and mobile application testing and provides a wide range of built-in functionality for these purposes. It also supports integration with third-party tools and frameworks such as Telerik Testing Framework and NUnit.

  4. Test Execution and Reporting: Karate DSL provides a command-line interface for test execution, allowing users to run tests in an automated and scalable manner. It also generates comprehensive HTML reports with detailed test results and error messages. Test Studio provides a graphical user interface for test execution, allowing users to run tests interactively. It also generates detailed test reports in various formats such as HTML, XML, and PDF.

  5. License and Cost: Karate DSL is an open-source project released under the Apache License 2.0, which means it is free to use and modify. Test Studio, on the other hand, is a commercial product developed by Progress Software Corporation and requires the purchase of a license for commercial use.

  6. Community Support: Karate DSL has an active and growing community of users and contributors who actively participate in forums, discussions, and provide support on various platforms such as GitHub and Stack Overflow. Test Studio also has a community forum and support channel but may have a smaller user base and community compared to Karate DSL.

In Summary, Karate DSL and Test Studio differ in terms of their execution environment, scripting language, integration and extensibility, test execution and reporting capabilities, license and cost, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Test Studio
Test Studio
Karate DSL
Karate DSL

It is a Windows-based software testing tool for web and desktop functional testing, software performance testing, load testing and mobile application testing. The tool ships with a plugin for Visual Studio and a standalone app that use the same repositories and file formats.

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Script-less test recording and playback; Cross-browser test execution – Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari (web browser); Support for HTML, AJAX, Silverlight, WPF and ASP.NET MVC application testing; Element abstraction and reuse.
Native support for both JSON and XML; Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"; Data-driven testing; Easy even for non-programmers; Embedded JavaScript engine; Test-doubles or HTTP mocking built-in; Re-use test scripts as performance-tests; Environment switching; Comprehensive reports, supported by all CI tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
11
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2
Stacks
148
Followers
17
Followers
268
Votes
0
Votes
85
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 11
    Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI
  • 9
    Easy for even non-programmers to get started
  • 9
    Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses
  • 7
    Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources
  • 5
    Comprehensive documentation and examples
Cons
  • 1
    Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern
  • 1
    Karate uses its own scripting language
  • 1
    There is no IntelliSense support in IDE
  • 1
    Finding errors in code is not easy
  • 1
    Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b
Integrations
Testrail
Testrail
FogBugz
FogBugz
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Sentry
Sentry
Jira
Jira
TestFairy
TestFairy
Instabug
Instabug
HipTest
HipTest
JavaScript
JavaScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Java
Java
Cucumber
Cucumber
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JUnit
JUnit
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Test Studio, Karate DSL?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana